首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Sant e ́ Publique >If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...: Energy shots should be regulated as energy drinks in Canada
【2h】

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...: Energy shots should be regulated as energy drinks in Canada

机译:如果它看起来像鸭子又像鸭子一样嘎嘎……:在加拿大应将能量射击作为能量饮料进行管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2012, Health Canada transitioned caffeinated energy drinks from to classification and regulations, implementing temporary guidelines with requirements such as caffeine content limits, mandatory cautionary labelling, and restrictions on health claims. “Energy shots” often contain as much or more caffeine compared to energy drinks and have been associated with a similar number of adverse health events. However, current requirements for energy drinks do not apply to energy shots, which remain classified as “natural health products” on the basis that they are “not consumed or perceived as foods” in the same way as energy drinks. An online survey was conducted with Canadian youth and young adults aged 12–24 years ( = 2040) in October 2014 to examine perceptions of energy shots. Respondents viewed an image of a popular energy shot and were asked which term best described it, with six randomly-ordered options. The vast majority (78.8%) perceived the energy shot as an “energy drink” (vs. “supplement”, “vitamin drink”, “natural health product”, “soft drink” or “food product”). Given consumer perceptions and the similarity in product constituents, there is little basis for regulating energy shots differently from energy drinks; these products should be subject to similar labelling and health warning requirements.
机译:2012年,加拿大卫生部将含咖啡因的能量饮料从分类过渡到法规,实施了临时指南,其中规定了咖啡因含量限制,强制性警告标签和健康声明限制。与能量饮料相比,“能量注射”通常含有更多或更多的咖啡因,并且与类似数量的不良健康事件有关。但是,当前对能量饮料的要求不适用于能量饮料,能量饮料仍被归类为“天然保健品”,因为它们与能量饮料一样,不被“食用或被视为食物”。 2014年10月,对12至24岁(= 2040年)的加拿大青年和年轻人进行了在线调查,以检查对能量枪击的看法。受访者查看了流行能量拍摄的图像,并被问到哪个术语最能描述它,并有六个随机排序的选项。绝大多数(78.8%)的人将能量注入视为“能量饮料”(与“补充”,“维生素饮料”,“天然保健品”,“软饮料”或“食品”相对)。考虑到消费者的看法和产品成分的相似性,几乎没有依据来调节能量饮料和能量饮料的依据;这些产品应遵守类似的标签和健康警告要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号