首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 215 Revision 1 (FGE.215Rev1): seven αβ‐unsaturated cinnamyl ketones from subgroup 3.2 of FGE.19
【2h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 215 Revision 1 (FGE.215Rev1): seven αβ‐unsaturated cinnamyl ketones from subgroup 3.2 of FGE.19

机译:关于调味剂组评估的科学意见215修订版1(FGE.215Rev1):来自FGE.19子组3.2的七个αβ-不饱和肉桂基酮

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of flavouring substances from subgroup 3.2 of .19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 215, Revision 1 ( .215Rev1). In .215, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids concluded that the concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out and requested data for the two representative substances 4‐phenylbut‐3‐en‐2‐one [ ‐no: 07.024] and 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)pent‐1‐en‐3‐one [ ‐no: 07.030]. The Flavour Industry has provided additional genotoxicity studies for both representative substances [ ‐no: 07.024] and [ ‐no: 07.030]. Based on these new data, the Panel concluded that the concern for genotoxicity is ruled out for the representative substance [ ‐no: 07.024] and for the structurally related substances 4‐phenylbut‐3‐en‐2‐ol [ ‐no: 02.066] and 3‐methyl‐4‐phenylbut‐3‐en‐2‐one [ ‐no: 07.027] which can accordingly be evaluated through the Procedure in .69. For the representative substance 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)pent‐1‐en‐3‐one [ ‐no: 07.030], the Panel concluded that [ ‐no: 07.030] is aneugenic . For such substances, there is currently no agreed follow‐up strategy to finalise their safety assessment. The Panel is aware that the Scientific Committee is going to address this issue and a statement clarifying the assessment of aneugenic substances is under preparation. The Panel concluded therefore that, for the time being, the representative substance 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)pent‐1‐en‐3‐one [ ‐no: 07.030] and the structurally related substances vanillylidene acetone [ ‐no: 07.046] and 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐4‐methylpent‐1‐en‐3‐one [ ‐no: 07.049] cannot be evaluated through the Procedure. The Panel further concluded that 4‐(2,3,6‐trimethylphenyl)but‐3‐en‐2‐one [ ‐no: 07.206] is to be considered as a stand‐alone substance due to the presence of the methyl groups, therefore, genotoxicity data were requested for [ ‐no: 07.206]. Industry communicated that the evaluation of [ ‐no: 07.206] is not supported any longer, therefore additional data were not submitted.
机译:欧洲食品安全局食品添加剂和调味料小组被要求在调味料组评估215修订版1(.215Rev1)中评估.19的3.2分组的调味剂的潜在遗传毒性。在.215中,食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂小组得出结论认为,不能排除对遗传毒性的关注,并要求提供两种代表性物质4-苯基但是3-en-2-一种的数据[-否:07.024]和1-(4-甲氧基苯基)pent-1-en-3-3- [[no:07.030]。调味品行业还提供了针对两种代表性物质[‐no:07.024]和[‐no:07.030]的其他遗传毒性研究。根据这些新数据,小组得出结论,排除了代表物质[‐no:07.024]和与结构相关的物质4-苯基丁-3-en-2-ol [‐no:02.066]对遗传毒性的关注。和3-甲基-4-苯基丁-3-烯-2-酮[‐no:07.027],可以通过.69中的步骤进行评估。对于代表性物质1-(4-甲氧基苯基)戊-1-烯-3-酮[-no:07.030],专家小组认为[-no:07.030]具有气生作用。对于此类物质,目前尚无商定的后续策略来完成其安全性评估。评估小组知道科学委员会将处理此问题,并且正在准备澄清对气生物质评估的声明。因此,专家小组得出结论认为,暂时代表性的物质是1-(4-甲氧基苯基)戊-1-烯-3-酮[-no:07.030]和与结构相关的物质万烷基亚砜丙酮[-no:07.046]和1-(4-甲氧基苯基)-4-甲基戊-1-烯-3-酮[-no:07.049]无法通过该程序进行评估。专家组进一步得出结论,由于存在甲基,因此应将4-(2,3,6-三甲基苯基)但-3-en-2-1 [-no:07.206]视为独立物质,因此,要求提供[-no:07.206]的遗传毒性数据。业界表示,不再支持[-no:07.206]的评估,因此未提交其他数据。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号