首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the organic acids lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses and pork cuts
【2h】

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the organic acids lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses and pork cuts

机译:评估有机酸乳酸和乙酸减少猪肉car体和切块上微生物表面污染的安全性和有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses pre‐chill and pork meat cuts post‐chill were assessed. Lactic acid treatments consisted of 2–5% solutions at temperatures of up to 80°C applied to carcasses by spraying or up to 55°C applied on cuts by spraying or dipping. Acetic acid treatments consisted of 2–4% solutions at temperatures of up to 40°C applied on carcasses by spraying or on cuts by spraying or dipping. The maximum treatment duration was 30 s. The Panel concluded that: [1] the treatments are of no safety concern, provided that the substances comply with the European Union specifications for food additives; [2] spraying of pork carcasses pre‐chill with lactic acid was efficacious compared to untreated control, but based on the available data, the Panel could not conclude whether lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment when spraying of pork carcasses pre‐chill or pork meat cuts post‐chill. The Panel concluded that dipping of pork meat cuts post‐chill in lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment. However, it could not conclude on the efficacy of acetic acid treatment of pork carcasses pre‐chill and/or pork meat cuts post‐chill; [3] the potential selection and emergence of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to biocides and/or resistance to therapeutic antimicrobials linked to the use of the substances is unlikely as long as Good Hygienic Practices are implemented; and [4] the release of both organic acids is not of concern for the environment, assuming that wastewaters released by the slaughterhouses are treated, if necessary, to counter the potentially low caused by lactic or acetic acid, in compliance with local rules.
机译:评估了评估乳酸和乙酸减少冷冻前猪肉and体和冷冻后猪肉切块的微生物表面污染的安全性和有效性的研究。乳酸处理由2%至5%的溶液组成,最高温度可通过喷涂施加到屠体上,最高温度为80°C,或者最高温度通过喷雾或浸涂在切块上,最高温度为55°C。乙酸处理包括在高达40°C的温度下通过喷涂或通过喷涂或浸渍在切块上施加的高达2-4%的溶液。最长治疗时间为30秒。小组得出结论认为:[1]只要该物质符合欧盟有关食品添加剂的规范,这些处理就不会引起安全问题; [2]与未处理的对照组相比,预冷的乳酸喷洒猪肉屠体是有效的,但是根据现有的数据,专家小组无法得出结论,在预冷的喷洒猪肉屠体或用水喷洒猪肉时,乳酸是否比水处理更有效猪肉切冷后。小组得出结论认为,将猪肉切成薄片在冷冻后放入乳酸中比水处理更有效。但是,尚不能就醋酸在冷冻前和/或冷冻后切肉的效果进行总结。 [3]只要实施了良好卫生规范,就不太可能潜在地选择和出现对杀生物剂敏感度降低和/或与使用该物质有关的对治疗性抗菌药物耐药的细菌; [4]这两种有机酸的释放与环境无关,假定屠宰场释放的废水在必要时经过处理,以应对乳酸或乙酸引起的潜在低排放,并符合当地法规。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号