首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 200 Revision 1 (FGE.200 Rev.1): 74 αβ‐unsaturated aliphatic aldehydes and precursors from chemical subgroup 1.1.1 of FGE.19
【2h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 200 Revision 1 (FGE.200 Rev.1): 74 αβ‐unsaturated aliphatic aldehydes and precursors from chemical subgroup 1.1.1 of FGE.19

机译:关于调味基团评估200的科学意见修订版1(FGE.200 Rev.1):74αβ-不饱和脂族醛和FGE.19化学亚组1.1.1的前体

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 74 flavouring substances from subgroup 1.1.1 of .19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 200 Revision 1 ( .200 Rev1). In .200, genotoxicity studies were provided for one representative substance, namely hex‐2( )‐enal [ ‐no: 05.073], and for other two substances in the same subgroup, namely 2‐dodecenal [ ‐no: 05.037] and 2‐nonenal [ ‐no: 05.171]. The Panel concluded that the concern still remains with respect to genotoxicity for the substances of this subgroup and requested an Comet assay performed in duodenum and liver for hex‐2( )‐enal [ ‐no: 05.073]. For the two other representative substances of subgroup 1.1.1 (nona‐2( ),6( )‐dienal [ ‐no: 05.058] and oct‐2‐enal [ ‐no: 05.060]), the Panel requested a combined Comet assay and micronucleus assay. These data have been provided and are evaluated in the present opinion .200 Rev1. Industry submitted genotoxicity studies on ‐2‐octenal [ ‐no: 05.190], instead of oct‐2‐enal [ ‐no: 05.060]. Based on the available data, the Panel concluded that the concern for genotoxicity can be ruled out for hex‐2( )‐enal [ ‐no: 05.073], ‐2‐octenal [ ‐no: 05.190] and nona‐2( ),6( )‐dienal [ ‐no: 05.058], therefore all the 74 substances [ ‐no: 02.020, 02.049, 02.050, 02.090, 02.112, 02.137, 02.156, 02.192, 02.210, 02.231, 05.037, 05.058, 05.060, 05.070, 05.072, 05.073, 05.076, 05.078, 05.102, 05.109, 05.111, 05.114, 05.120, 05.144, 05.150, 05.171, 05.172, 05.179, 05.184, 05.189, 05.190, 05.191, 05.195, 06.025, 06.031, 06.072, 09.054, 09.097, 09.109, 09.119, 09.146, 09.233, 09.244, 09.247, 09.276, 09.277, 09.303, 09.312, 09.385, 09.394, 09.395, 09.396, 09.397, 09.398, 09.399, 09.400, 09.410, 09.411, 09.469, 09.482, 09.489, 09.492, 09.493, 09.498, 09.678, 09.701, 09.719, 09.741, 09.790, 09.841, 09.866, 09.947, 09.948, 13.004] can be evaluated through the Procedure for flavouring substances.
机译:欧洲食品安全局食品添加剂和调味料小组被要求在调味料组评估200修订版1(.200 Rev1)中评估.19的亚组1.1.1的74种调味物质的遗传毒性潜力。在.200中,提供了对一种代表性物质,即hex-2()-enal [-no:05.073]以及同一亚组中其他两种物质,即2-dodecenal [‐no:05.037]和2的遗传毒性研究。 -nonenal [-no:05.171]。专家组认为,对该亚组物质的遗传毒性仍然存在担忧,并要求在十二指肠和肝脏中对hex-2()-enal进行彗星试验​​[-no:05.073]。对于亚组1.1.1的其他两种代表性物质(壬二2(),6()二烯[[no:05.058]和八-2-烯醛[[no:05.060])),专家组要求进行彗星分析和微核分析。这些数据已经提供并在当前意见中评估。200Rev1。工业界提交了关于-2-辛烯醛[-否:05.190]的遗传毒性研究,而不是针对-2-辛烯醛的[-否:05.060]。专家小组根据现有数据得出结论,可以排除十六进制2()-enal [-no:05.073],-2-辛烯八度[-no:05.190]和nona-2()对遗传毒性的关注, 6()-否[-no:05.058],因此所有74种物质[-no:02.020、02.049、02.050、02.090、02.112、02.137、02.156、02.192、02.210、02.231、05.037、05.058、05.060、05.070、05.072 ,05.073、05.076、05.078、05.102、05.109、05.111、05.114、05.120、05.144、05.150、05.171、05.172、05.179、05.184、05.189、05.190、05.191、05.195、06.025、06.031、06.072、09.054、09.097、09.109 ,09.146、09.233、09.244、09.247、09.276、09.277、09.303、09.312、09.385、09.394、09.395、09.396、09.397、09.398、09.399、09.400、09.410、09.411、09.469、09.482、09.489、09.492、09.493、09.498 ,09.701、09.719、09.741、09.790、09.841、09.866、09.947、09.948、13.004]可以通过调味剂程序进行评估。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号