首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 201 Revision 2 (FGE.201Rev2): 2‐alkylated aliphatic acyclic alphabeta‐unsaturated aldehydes and precursors with or without additional double‐bonds from chemical subgroup 1.1.2 of FGE.19
【2h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 201 Revision 2 (FGE.201Rev2): 2‐alkylated aliphatic acyclic alphabeta‐unsaturated aldehydes and precursors with or without additional double‐bonds from chemical subgroup 1.1.2 of FGE.19

机译:关于香料基团评估201修订版2(FGE.201Rev2)的科学意见:来自FGE.19化学子组1.2-烷基化脂肪族无环αβ-不饱和醛和前体带有或不带有其他双键。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to consider in this revision 2 of Flavouring Group Evaluation 201, the additional data on genotoxicity submitted by the Industry on two substances, 2‐methylpent‐2‐enal [ ‐no: 05.090] and 2 methylcrotonaldehyde [ ‐no: 05.095], from subgroup 1.1.2 of .19. In .201Rev1, the Panel concluded that further data were required in order to clarify the genotoxic potential of this subgroup and considered the testing of 2‐methylcrotonaldehyde [ ‐no: 05.095] in a comet assay in liver and duodenum, the first site of contact, as a preferred option to further investigate the genotoxicity . New genotoxicity studies have been submitted for both 2‐methylpent‐2‐enal [ ‐no: 05.090] and 2‐methylcrotonaldehyde [ ‐no: 05.095]. 2‐Methylpent‐2‐enal [ ‐no: 05.090] tested in a combined micronucleus/comet assay did not induce damage, overruling the weak gene mutation effect observed in bacteria and confirming the negative results observed in the micronucleus assay. 2‐Methylcrotonaldehyde [ ‐no: 05.095] did not induce gene mutations in liver and glandular stomach of transgenic rats. In addition, 2‐methylcrotonaldehyde [ ‐no: 05.095] tested in an comet assay in liver and duodenum, it did not induce damage. Overall, the Panel concluded that the genotoxic evidence observed , was not confirmed for the representative substances 2‐methylcrotonaldehyde [ ‐no: 05.095] and 2‐methylpent‐2‐enal [ ‐no: 05.090], therefore all the 10 substances in this subgroup [ ‐no: 02.174, 05.033, 05.090, 05.095, 05.105, 05.107, 05.126, 07.261, 12.065 and 12.079] can be evaluated through the Procedure for the evaluation of flavouring substances.
机译:要求欧洲食品安全局食品添加剂和调味料小组在调味剂评估201的本修订版2中考虑工业界提交的关于两种物质2-甲基戊-2-烯醛[-no :05.090]和2个甲基巴豆醛[-no:05.095],来自.19的子集1.1.2。在.201Rev1中,专家小组得出结论,需要进一步的数据来阐明该亚组的遗传毒性潜力,并考虑了在肝脏和十二指肠(这是第一个接触部位)的彗星试验中对2-甲基巴豆醛的检测[-no:05.095]。 ,作为进一步研究遗传毒性的首选方法。对于2-甲基戊-2-烯醛[-no:05.090]和2-甲基巴豆醛[-no:05.095],已经提交了新的遗传毒性研究。在组合的微核/彗星试验中测试的2-甲基戊-2-烯[[no:05.090]不会引起损伤,从而推翻了细菌中观察到的弱基因突变效应,并证实了在微核试验中观察到的阴性结果。 2-甲基巴豆醛[-no:05.095]不会在转基因大鼠的肝脏和腺胃中诱导基因突变。此外,在肝脏和十二指肠的彗星试验中测试了2-甲基巴豆醛[‐no:05.095],它不会引起损伤。总体而言,专家小组认为,尚未确认代表性物质2-甲基巴豆醛[-no:05.095]和2-甲基戊-2-烯醛[-no:05.090]观察到的遗传毒性证据,因此,该亚组中的所有10种物质[-no:02.174、05.033、05.090、05.095、05.105、05.107、05.126、07.261、12.065和12.079]可以通过评估调味物质的程序进行评估。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号