首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Brain Mapping >Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: A simulation study with variable signal‐to‐noise ratio and number of sensors
【2h】

Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: A simulation study with variable signal‐to‐noise ratio and number of sensors

机译:EEG和MEG数据的多模式集成:具有可变信噪比和传感器数量的仿真研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous simulation studies have stressed the importance of the multimodal integration of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data in the estimation of cortical current density. In such studies, no systematic variations of the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and of the number of sensors were explicitly taken into account in the estimation process. We investigated effects of variable SNR and number of sensors on the accuracy of current density estimate by using multimodal EEG and MEG data. This was done by using as the dependent variable both the correlation coefficient (CC) and the relative error (RE) between imposed and estimated waveforms at the level of cortical region of interests (ROI). A realistic head and cortical surface model was used. Factors used in the simulations were: (1) the SNR of the simulated scalp data (with seven levels: infinite, 30, 20, 10, 5, 3, 1); (2) the particular inverse operator used to estimate the cortical source activity from the simulated scalp data (INVERSE, with two levels, including minimum norm and weighted minimum norm); and (3) the number of EEG or MEG sensors employed in the analysis (SENSORS, with three levels: 128, 61, 29 for EEG and 153, 61, or 38 in MEG). Analysis of variance demonstrated that all the considered factors significantly affect the CC and the RE indexes. Combined EEG–MEG data produced statistically significant lower RE and higher CC in source current density reconstructions compared to that estimated by the EEG and MEG data considered separately. These observations hold for the range of SNR values presented by the analyzed data. The superiority of current density estimation by multimodal integration of EEG and MEG was not due to differences in number of sensors between unimodal (EEG, MEG) and combined (EEG–MEG) inverse estimates. In fact, the current density estimate relative to the EEG–MEG multimodal integration involved 61 EEG plus 63 MEG sensors, whereas estimations carried out with the single modalities alone involved 128 sensors for EEG and 153 sensors for MEG. The results of the simulations also suggest that the use of simultaneous 29 EEG sensors during the MEG measurements carried out with full sensor arrangements (153 sensors) returned an accuracy of the cortical source estimate statistically similar to that obtained by combining 64 EEG and 153 MEG sensors. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22:54–64, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译:先前的模拟研究强调了脑电图(EEG)和磁脑电图(MEG)数据的多峰集成在评估皮层电流密度中的重要性。在此类研究中,在估算过程中未明确考虑信噪比(SNR)和传感器数量的系统变化。我们通过使用多模式EEG和MEG数据研究了可变SNR和传感器数量对电流密度估计精度的影响。这是通过将相关系数(CC)和在感兴趣的皮质区域(ROI)级别的施加波形和估计波形之间的相对误差(RE)用作因变量来完成的。使用了逼真的头部和皮质表面模型。模拟中使用的因素是:(1)模拟头皮数据的SNR(具有七个级别:无限,30、20、10、5、3、1); (2)用于从模拟头皮数据估计皮质源活动的特定逆算子(INVERSE,具有两个级别,包括最小范数和加权最小范数); (3)分析中使用的EEG或MEG传感器的数量(传感器,分为三个级别:EEG为128、61、29,MEG为153、61或38)。方差分析表明,所有考虑的因素均显着影响CC和RE指数。与单独考虑的EEG和MEG数据所估计的相比,EEG–MEG组合数据在源电流密度重建中产生了统计学上显着较低的RE和较高的CC。这些观察结果适用于分析数据显示的SNR值范围。通过脑电图和脑电图的多模式集成进行电流密度估计的优越性,并不是由于单模式(EEG,MEG)和组合式(EEG–MEG)逆估计之间传感器数量的差异。实际上,相对于EEG-MEG多模式集成的当前密度估计涉及61个EEG加63个MEG传感器,而仅使用单个模式进行的估计就包括128个EEG传感器和153个MEG传感器。仿真结果还表明,在使用完整传感器装置(153个传感器)进行的MEG测量过程中,同时使用29个EEG传感器返回的皮层来源估计值的准确性在统计上类似于通过组合64个EEG和153个MEG传感器获得的准确性。哼。脑图22:54–64,2004年。©2004 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号