首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences >DSM-5 two years later: facts myths and some key open issues
【2h】

DSM-5 two years later: facts myths and some key open issues

机译:两年后的DSM-5:事实神话和一些关键的未解决问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In May 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the fifth edition of its (DSM-5). The process that led to the release of the DSM-5 took nearly two decades, with working groups of experts asked to propose revisions based on the most recent research findings. Originally, the APA hoped to introduce a ‘paradigm shift’, in which psychiatric diagnosis would be in greater harmony with neuroscience (Regier ). When it became clear the data supporting these changes were too fragmentary for radical changes, the APA backed off from major revisions (Paris & Phillips, ). In fact, to date, there is no knowledge on whether most conditions listed in the manual are true diseases. In the meantime, while waiting for genetics and neuroscience to elucidate the causes (and guide the treatment) of psychiatric disorders, we should simply acknowledge, ‘our classification of mental disorders is no more than a collection of fallible and limited constructs that seek, but never find, an elusive truth. Nevertheless, this is our best current way of defining and communicating about mental disorders’ (Frances & Widiger, ).
机译:2013年5月,美国精神病学协会(APA)出版了其第五版(DSM-5)。导致DSM-5发行的过程耗时近二十年,专家工作组被要求根据最新研究结果提出修订建议。最初,APA希望引入“范式转变”,其中精神病学诊断将与神经科学更加融洽(Regier )。显然,支持这些更改的数据过于零散,无法进行根本的更改,因此APA从主要修订版本中退出(巴黎和菲利普斯,)。实际上,迄今为止,尚不了解手册中列出的大多数情况是否是真正的疾病。同时,在等待遗传学和神经科学阐明精神疾病的病因(并指导治疗)的同时,我们应该简单地承认:“我们对精神疾病的分类只不过是一些容易寻求的,易受误解的结构而已,永远找不到,一个难以捉摸的真理。不过,这是目前定义和交流精神障碍的最佳方法(Frances&Widiger,)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号