首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Reproducibility of Ablated Volume Measurement Is Higher with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound than with B-Mode Ultrasound after Benign Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation—A Preliminary Study
【2h】

Reproducibility of Ablated Volume Measurement Is Higher with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound than with B-Mode Ultrasound after Benign Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation—A Preliminary Study

机译:良性甲状腺结节射频消融后造影剂超声消融体积测量的可重复性高于B型超声—初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and standard B-mode ultrasound in the assessment of radiofrequency-ablated volume of benign thyroid nodules was compared. A preliminary study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules between 2014 and 2016, with available CEUS and B-mode post-ablation checks. CEUS and B-mode images were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement in the assessment of ablated volume (Bland–Altman test). For CEUS, the mean inter-observer difference (95% limits of agreement) was 0.219 mL (-0.372–0.809 mL); for B-mode, the mean difference was 0.880 mL (-1.655–3.414 mL). Reproducibility was significantly higher for CEUS (85%) than for B-mode (27%). Mean intra-observer differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.013 mL (0.803–4.097 mL) for Reader 1 and 0.031 mL (0.763–3.931 mL) for Reader 2 using CEUS, while they were 0.567 mL (-2.180–4.317 mL, Reader 1) and 0.759 mL (-2.584–4.290 mL, Reader 2) for B-mode. Intra-observer reproducibility was significantly higher for CEUS (96% and 95%, for the two readers) than for B-mode (21% and 23%). In conclusion, CEUS had higher reproducibility and inter- and intra-observer agreement compared to conventional B-mode in the assessment of radiofrequency-ablated volume of benign thyroid nodules.
机译:比较了增强超声(CEUS)和标准B型超声在评估射频消融的甲状腺良性结节体积中的可重复性。我们对2014年至2016年间对甲状腺良性结节进行射频消融(RFA)的连续患者进行了初步研究,并进行了CEUS和B型消融后检查。两名放射科医生对CEUS和B型图像进行了回顾性评估,以评估消融量评估中观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性(Bland–Altman测试)。对于CEUS,观察者之间的平均差异(一致同意的95%限制)为0.219 mL(-0.372–0.809 mL);对于B模式,平均差异为0.880 mL(-1.655–3.414 mL)。 CEUS(85%)的重现性显着高于B模式(27%)。使用CEUS的阅读器1的平均观察者内部差异(一致度的95%限制)为0.013 mL(0.803–4.097 mL),阅读器2的平均观察者差异为0.567 mL(-2.180–4.317 mL)为0.031 mL(0.763–3.931 mL) ,读数器1)和0.759毫升(-2.584–4.290毫升,读数器2)用于B模式。 CEUS的观察者内部可重复性显着高于B模式(21%和23%)(两个阅读器分别为96%和95%)。总之,在评估射频消融的甲状腺良性结节体积方面,CEUS与常规B模式相比具有更高的重现性以及观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号