首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >Inequalities in the benefits of national health insurance on financial protection from out-of-pocket payments and access to health services: cross-sectional evidence from Ghana
【2h】

Inequalities in the benefits of national health insurance on financial protection from out-of-pocket payments and access to health services: cross-sectional evidence from Ghana

机译:从自付费用和获得卫生服务获得财政保护的国家健康保险利益不平等:加纳的横断面证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A central pillar of universal health coverage (UHC) is to achieve financial protection from catastrophic health expenditure. There are concerns, however, that national health insurance programmes with premiums may not benefit impoverished groups. In 2003, Ghana became the first sub-Saharan African country to introduce a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with progressively structured premium charges. In this study, we test the impact of being insured on utilization and financial risk protection compared with no enrolment, using the 2012–13 Ghana Living Standards Survey (  = 72 372). Consistent with previous studies, we observed that participating in health insurance significantly decreased the probability of unmet medical needs by 15 percentage points (p.p.) and that of incurring catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments by 7 p.p. relative to no enrolment in the NHIS. Households living outside a 1-h radius to the nearest hospital had lower reductions in financial risk from excess OOP medical spending relative to households living closer (−5 p.p. vs −9 p.p.). We also find evidence that in Ghana, the scheme was highly pro-poor. Once insured, the poorest 40% of households experienced significantly larger improvements in medical utilization (18 p.p. vs. 8 p.p.) and substantively larger reductions in catastrophic OOP health expenditure (−10 p.p. vs. −6 p.p.) compared with that of the richest households. However, health insurance did not benefit vulnerable persons equally from financial risk. Once insured, poor, low-educated and self-employed households living far from hospitals had significantly lower reductions in catastrophic OOP medical spending compared with their counterparts living closer. Taken together, we show that enrolment in the NHIS is associated with improved financial protection but less so among geographically remote vulnerable groups. Efforts to boost not just insurance uptake but also health service delivery may be needed as a supplement for insurance schemes to accelerate progress towards UHC.
机译:全民健康覆盖(UHC)的中心支柱是实现财务保护,以免遭受灾难性的健康支出。然而,令人担忧的是,带保险费的国家健康保险计划可能无法使贫困群体受益。 2003年,加纳成为第一个引入国家医疗保险计划(NHIS)的撒哈拉以南非洲国家,该计划逐步制定了保费收费标准。在这项研究中,我们使用2012-13年加纳生活水平调查(= 72372)来测试被保险对没有使用保险的使用和财务风险保护的影响。与以前的研究一致,我们观察到参加健康保险可将未满足医疗需求的概率显着降低15个百分点(p.p.p),并使发生灾难性自付费用(OOP)的健康保险的概率降低7p.p。相对于没有注册NHIS的情况。相对于生活较近的家庭,居住在距离最近医院不到1小时半径范围内的家庭因OOP医疗支出过多而降低了财务风险(相对于生活在-5 p.p. --9 p.p.的家庭)。我们还发现有证据表明,在加纳,该计划极度有利于穷人。与最富裕的家庭相比,一旦获得了保险,最贫困的40%的家庭在医疗利用率方面的改善显着更大(18 pp对8 pp),灾难性OOP健康支出的减少幅度更大(-10 pp对-6 pp)。 。但是,健康保险不能使脆弱人群从金融风险中平均受益。与投保较近的家庭相比,生活在远离医院的贫困,低学历和自雇家庭一旦获得了保险,其灾难性的OOP医疗支出的减少幅度将大大降低。综上所述,我们表明,NHIS的入学与改善的金融保护相关,但在地理上较弱的弱势群体中却较少。可能不仅需要增加保险的使用,还需要增加医疗服务的提供,以此作为保险计划的补充,以加快实现UHC的进程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号