首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Nutrition >Best Practices for Dietary Supplement Assessment and Estimation of Total Usual Nutrient Intakes in Population-Level Research and Monitoring
【2h】

Best Practices for Dietary Supplement Assessment and Estimation of Total Usual Nutrient Intakes in Population-Level Research and Monitoring

机译:在人口水平的研究和监测中膳食补充剂评估和日常总营养摄入量估算的最佳做法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of dietary supplements (DS) is pervasive and can provide substantial amounts of micronutrients to those who use them. Therefore when characterizing dietary intakes, describing the prevalence of inadequacy or excess, or assessing relations between nutrients and health outcomes, it is critical to incorporate DS intakes to improve exposure estimates. Unfortunately, little is known about the best methods to assess DS, and the structure of measurement error in DS reporting. Several characteristics of nutrients from DS are salient to understand when comparing to those in foods. First, DS can be consumed daily or episodically, in bolus form and can deliver discrete and often very high doses of nutrients that are not limited by energy intakes. These characteristics contribute to bimodal distributions and distributions severely skewed to the right. Labels on DS often provide nutrient forms that differ from those found in conventional foods, and underestimate analytically derived values. Finally, the bioavailability of many nutrient-containing DS is not known and it may not be the same as the nutrients in a food matrix. Current methods to estimate usual intakes are not designed specifically to handle DS. Two temporal procedures are described to refer to the order that nutrient intakes are combined relative to usual intake procedures, referred to as a “shrinking” the distribution to remove random error. The “shrink then add” approach is preferable to the “add then shrink” approach when users and nonusers are combined for most research questions. Stratifying by DS before usual intake methods is another defensible option. This review describes how to incorporate nutrient intakes from DS to usual intakes from foods, and describes the available methods and fit-for-purpose of different analytical strategies to address research questions where total usual intakes are of interest at the group level for use in nutrition research and to inform policy decisions. Clinical Trial Registry: .
机译:膳食补充剂(DS)的使用非常普遍,可以为使用它们的人提供大量的微量营养素。因此,在表征饮食摄入量,描述不足或过量的患病率或评估营养素与健康结果之间的关系时,至关重要的是纳入DS摄入量以改善接触估计。不幸的是,对于评估DS的最佳方法以及DS报告中的测量误差的结构知之甚少。与食品中的营养素相比,DS的营养素的几个特征很重要。首先,DS可以大丸剂的形式每天或通过外用法消耗,并且可以提供不受能量摄入限制的离散且通常非常高剂量的营养素。这些特征导致双峰分布和严重偏向右侧的分布。 DS上的标签通常提供与传统食品不同的营养形式,并且低估了分析得出的值。最后,许多含营养素的DS的生物利用度未知,它可能与食物基质中的营养素不同。目前估算正常摄入量的方法并非专门为处理DS设计的。描述了两个时间程序,以参考相对于通常的摄入程序组合营养摄入量的顺序,称为“缩小”分布以消除随机误差。当用户和非用户合并用于大多数研究问题时,“先收缩再添加”方法比“先收缩再添加”方法更好。 DS在通常的摄入方法之前进行分层是另一种可行的选择。这篇综述描述了如何将DS中的营养素摄入量与食物中的常规摄入量相结合,并描述了各种分析策略的可用方法和适用性,以解决在组水平上感兴趣的全部常规摄入量用于营养中的研究问题研究并为决策提供依据。临床试验注册:。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号