首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Vaccines >Utilising Group-Size and Home-Range Characteristics of Free-Roaming Dogs (FRD) to Guide Mass Vaccination Campaigns against Rabies in India
【2h】

Utilising Group-Size and Home-Range Characteristics of Free-Roaming Dogs (FRD) to Guide Mass Vaccination Campaigns against Rabies in India

机译:利用自由漫游犬(FRD)的小组规模和家庭活动特征来指导针对印度狂犬病的大规模疫苗接种运动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Adequate vaccination coverage of free roaming dogs (FRD) against canine rabies is not achieved primarily due to difficulties in administering parenteral vaccinations to this population. One factor associated with this difficulty is the tendency of FRD to form groups, which increases their aggressive behavior, resulting in a significant risk of dog-bites for the vaccinators. This study investigated factors that influenced FRD forming groups and their home-ranges, using data obtained from photographic capture-recapture/sight-resight surveys conducted in rural Shirsuphal (584 sightings) and urban Panchkula (3208 sightings), India. In the rural site, older dogs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2–0.9, = 0.03) and FRD sighted within 20 m of garbage sites (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9, = 0.02) were less likely to be in groups. The number of dogs sighted with an FRD decreased with increased resight-probability of that dog (β = −1.0, < 0.001). The rural FRD with smaller home-ranges were more likely to be sighted alone (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–95, = 0.04) than those with larger home-ranges. In the urban site, females (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.5, = 0.002) and older dogs (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.1, = 0.07) were more likely to be found in groups, and groups of dogs were more likely to be seen within 20 m of garbage sites (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5–2.0, < 0.001). The distribution of urban FRD sighted alone, in pairs, triads, and in packs of ≥4 dogs were not random in the administrative ( = 0.02), and the two industrial ( = 0.03 & 0.01) survey tracks of the urban site, implying stable groups. The resighting probability of a dog (β = 0.3, < 0.0001) and presence of garbage within 20 m (β = 0.2, < 0.0001) in the urban site increased the likelihood of sighting a FRD with other dogs. It is concluded that data on the resighting probability, presence of garbage points, and home-ranges can be utilised to guide the selection of parenteral or oral rabies vaccination to achieve a population vaccination coverage of 70% to break the transmission cycle of rabies virus in FRD in India.
机译:未能实现针对犬狂犬病的自由漫游犬(FRD)的足够疫苗接种覆盖率,这主要是由于难以对该人群进行肠胃外疫苗接种。与这一困难相关的一个因素是FRD倾向于形成群体,这增加了他们的攻击行为,从而导致接种者被狗咬的风险很大。这项研究使用从在印度的Shirsuphal农村(584个目击事件)和Panchkula城市(3208个目击事件)进行的照相捕获-捕获/观察-目视调查获得的数据,调查了影响FRD形成组及其家庭范围的因素。在农村地区,在垃圾场所20 m以内发现较大狗(OR 0.5,95%CI 0.2-0.9,= 0.03)和FRD的可能性较小。组。观察到有FRD的狗的数量随该狗的视概率增加而降低(β= -1.0,<0.001)。与家庭范围较大的家庭相比,家庭范围较小的农村FRD更有可能被单独看到(OR 2.3,95%CI 1.0-95,= 0.04)。在城市地区,成组和成组的狗中更有可能发现雌性(OR 1.3,95%CI 1.1-1.5,= 0.002)和年长的狗(OR 1.5,95%CI 1.1-2.1,= 0.07)。更有可能在20 m的垃圾场内看到(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.5-2.0,<0.001)。在行政区(= 0.02)和市区的两个工业区(= 0.03&0.01)的调查轨迹中,单独,成对,三合会和成组≥4只狗的城市FRD分布不是随机的,这意味着稳定组。一只狗(β= 0.3,<0.0001)的再视可能性以及城市场地20 m以内的垃圾存在(β= 0.2,<0.0001),增加了与其他狗一起发现FRD的可能性。结论是,可以利用有关重新检查概率,垃圾点的存在和家庭范围的数据来指导肠胃外或口服狂犬病疫苗接种的选择,以实现70%的人群疫苗接种覆盖率,从而打破狂犬病病毒的传播周期。印度的FRD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号