首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Effect of Different Rheological Models on the Distress Prediction of Composite Pavement
【2h】

Effect of Different Rheological Models on the Distress Prediction of Composite Pavement

机译:不同流变模型对复合路面破损预测的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper, three different rheological models including a newly developed formulation based on the current Christensen Anderson and Marateanu (CAM) model, named sigmoidal CAM model (SCM), are used to estimate the evolution of roughness, rutting, and reflective cracking in a typical composite pavement structure currently widely adopted in South Korea. Three different asphalt mixtures were prepared and dynamic modulus tests were performed. Then, the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) was used for predicting the progression of the pavement distress and to estimate the effect of the three different models on such phenomena. It is found that the three different mathematical models provide lower and upper limits for roughness, rutting, and reflective cracking. While the CAM model may not be entirely reliable due to its inability in fitting the data in the high-temperature domain, SCM might result in moderately more conservative pavement design.
机译:在本文中,使用三种不同的流变模型,包括基于当前Christensen Anderson和Marateanu(CAM)模型的新开发配方(称为Sigmoidal CAM模型(SCM))来估计粗糙度,车辙和反射裂纹的演变。韩国目前广泛采用的典型复合路面结构。制备了三种不同的沥青混合物,并进行了动态模量测试。然后,使用机械-经验路面设计指南(MEPDG)来预测路面窘迫的进展并评估三种不同模型对这种现象的影响。发现这三种不同的数学模型为粗糙度,车辙和反射裂缝提供了上限和下限。尽管CAM模型由于无法在高温区域拟合数据而可能并不完全可靠,但SCM可能会导致路面设计较为保守。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号