首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry: Comparison of Different Preparation Methods and Implementation of a Practical Algorithm for Routine Diagnostics
【2h】

Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry: Comparison of Different Preparation Methods and Implementation of a Practical Algorithm for Routine Diagnostics

机译:基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱鉴定革兰氏阳性球菌:不同制备方法的比较和常规诊断实用算法的实现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared three sample preparation methods (direct transfer, the direct transfer-formic acid method with on-target formic acid treatment, and ethanol-formic acid extraction) for the identification of Gram-positive cocci with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). A total of 156 Gram-positive cocci representing the clinically most important genera, Aerococcus, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus, as well as more rare genera, such as Gemella and Granulicatella, were analyzed using a Bruker MALDI Biotyper. The rate of correct genus-level identifications was approximately 99% for all three sample preparation methods. The species identification rate was significantly higher for the direct transfer-formic acid method and ethanol-formic acid extraction (both 77.6%) than for direct transfer (64.1%). Using direct transfer-formic acid compared to direct transfer, the total time to result was increased by 22.6%, 16.4%, and 8.5% analyzing 12, 48, and 96 samples per run, respectively. In a subsequent prospective study, 1,619 clinical isolates of Gram-positive cocci were analyzed under routine conditions by MALDI-TOF MS, using the direct transfer-formic acid preparation, and by conventional biochemical methods. For 95.6% of the isolates, a congruence between conventional and MALDI-TOF MS identification was observed. Two major limitations were found using MALDI-TOF MS: the differentiation of members of the Streptococcus mitis group and the identification of Streptococcus dysgalactiae. The Bruker MALDI Biotyper system using the direct transfer-formic acid sample preparation method was shown to be a highly reliable tool for the identification of Gram-positive cocci. We here suggest a practical algorithm for the clinical laboratory combining MALDI-TOF MS with phenotypic and molecular methods.
机译:这项研究比较了三种样品制备方法(直接转移,直接转移甲酸法与目标甲酸处理以及乙醇-甲酸萃取)在基质辅助激光解吸电离-时间鉴定革兰氏阳性球菌中的应用。飞行质谱仪(MALDI-TOF MS)。使用布鲁克MALDI Biotyper分析了总共156种革兰氏阳性球菌,它们代表了临床上最重要的属,气球菌,肠球菌,葡萄球菌和链球菌,以及更罕见的属,例如双歧杆菌和肉芽孢杆菌。对于所有三种样品制备方法,正确的属水平鉴定率约为99%。直接转移甲酸法和乙醇-甲酸萃取法的物种识别率显着高于直接转移法(64.1%),均为77.6%。与直接转移相比,使用直接转移甲酸可得到的总时间增加了22.6%,16.4%和8.5%,每次运行分别分析了12个,48个和96个样品。在随后的一项前瞻性研究中,在常规条件下通过MALDI-TOF MS,直接转移甲酸制备和常规生化方法对1,619例革兰氏阳性球菌临床分离株进行了分析。对于95.6%的分离物,观察到常规和MALDI-TOF MS鉴定结果一致。使用MALDI-TOF MS发现了两个主要局限性:链球菌性关节炎组成员的分化和鉴定性乳链球菌。使用直接转移甲酸样品制备方法的布鲁克MALDI Biotyper系统显示出是鉴定革兰氏阳性球菌的高度可靠的工具。我们在这里为MALDI-TOF MS与表型和分子方法相结合的临床实验室提出了一种实用的算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号