首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Reliability Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task
【2h】

Reliability Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task

机译:基于敏捷性运动的新响应时间测试的可靠性有效性和实用性:简单与复杂的运动任务

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The importance of response time (RT) in sports is well known, but there is an evident lack of reliable and valid sport-specific measurement tools applicable in the evaluation of RT in trained athletes. This study aimed to identify the validity, reliability, and usefulness of four newly developed RT testing protocols among athletes from agility-saturated (AG) and non-agility-saturated (NAG) sports. Thirty-seven AG and ten NAG athletes (age: 20.9 ± 2.9; eleven females) volunteered to undergo: three randomized simple response time (SRT-1, SRT-2, and SRT-3) protocols that included a single limb movement, and one complex response time (CRT) protocol that included multi joint movements and whole body transition over a short distance (1.5 and 1.8m). Each RT test involved 3 trials with 5 randomized attempts per trial. Two sensors were placed at the left- and right-hand side for SRT-1 and SRT-2. Three sensors were positioned (left, middle, right) in SRT-3 and CRT. The intra-class-correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as a measure of reliability. Independent sample t-test, effect size (d), and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were calculated to define discriminative validity of the tests. The results showed the newly developed tests were more reliable and useful in the AG than NAG athletes (i.e., ICC between 0.68 and 0.97 versus 0.31-0.90, respectively). The RT of AG athletes was faster than that of NAG athletes in the CRT test from the left (p <0.01, = 2.40, AUC: 0.98), centre (p < 0.01, = 1.57, AUC: 0.89), and right sensor (p < 0.01, = 1.93, AUC: 0.89) locations. In contrast, there were no differences between the groups in the SRT tests. The weak correlation (i.e., r= 0.00-0.33) between the SRT and CRT tests suggests that response time of the single limb and multijoint limb movements should not be considered as a single motor capacity. In conclusion, this study showed that AG athletes had faster response time than their NAG peers during complex motor tasks. Such enhanced ability to rapidly and accurately reprogram complex motor tasks can be considered one of the essential qualities required for advanced performance in agility-based sports.
机译:响应时间(RT)在体育运动中的重要性是众所周知的,但是显然缺乏可靠且有效的运动专用测量工具,这些工具可用于评估训练有素的运动员的RT。这项研究旨在确定敏捷性饱和(AG)和非敏捷性饱和(NAG)运动员中四种最新开发的RT测试规程的有效性,可靠性和实用性。 37名AG和10名NAG运动员(年龄:20.9±2.9; 11名女性)自愿参加:三个随机的简单反应时间(SRT-1,SRT-2和SRT-3)方案,包括单肢运动,以及一种复杂的响应时间(CRT)协议,包括多关节运动和短距离(1.5和1.8m)的全身过渡。每个RT测试涉及3个试验,每个试验5次随机尝试。在SRT-1和SRT-2的左侧和右侧分别放置了两个传感器。在SRT-3和CRT中放置了三个传感器(左,中,右)。计算组内相关系数(ICC)作为可靠性的量度。计算独立样本的t检验,效应大小(d)和曲线下面积(AUC),以定义检验的判别有效性。结果表明,新开发的测试在AG中比NAG运动员更可靠和有用(即,ICC分别在0.68和0.97之间,而在0.31-0.90之间)。从左侧(p <0.01,= 2.40,AUC:0.98),中部(p <0.01,= 1.57,AUC:0.89)和右侧传感器(CRT)中,AG运动员的RT速度比NAG运动员的RT更快。 p <0.01,= 1.93,AUC:0.89)位置。相反,在SRT测试中各组之间没有差异。 SRT和CRT测试之间的弱相关性(即r = 0.00-0.33)表明单肢和多关节肢体运动的响应时间不应被视为单个运动能力。总之,这项研究表明,在复杂的运动任务中,AG运动员的反应时间比NAG运动员快。快速而准确地对复杂的运动任务进行重新编程的这种增强的功能可以被视为在基于敏捷的运动中实现高级性能所需的基本素质之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号