首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Direct Ertapenem Disk Screening Method for Identification of KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in Surveillance Swab Specimens
【2h】

Direct Ertapenem Disk Screening Method for Identification of KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in Surveillance Swab Specimens

机译:直接Ertapenem磁盘筛选方法鉴定监测拭子标本中生产KPC的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production in Gram-negative bacilli is an increasing problem worldwide. Rectal swab surveillance is recommended as a component of infection prevention programs, yet few screening methods are published. We compared detection of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in surveillance specimens by 2 methods: (i) inoculation of swabs in tryptic soy broth containing 2 μg/ml imipenem followed by plating to MacConkey agar (MAC) (method 1) and (ii) streaking swabs on MAC onto which a 10-μg ertapenem disk was then placed (method 2). Simulated rectal swab specimens of challenge isolates from a collection of well-characterized K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains and salvage rectal swab specimens collected from patients at 4 different health care facilities over a 7-month period were tested. The gold-standard comparator was blaKPC PCR testing of isolates. Method 1 detected 4/9 (44%) KPC-positive challenge isolates. By method 2, 9/9 KPC-positive challenge isolates exhibited zones of inhibition of ≤27 mm; all KPC-negative isolates exhibited zones of inhibition greater than 27 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of method 1 for detection of KPC-positive K. pneumoniae and E. coli in 149 rectal swab specimens were 65.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.8% to 80.8%) and 49.6% (95% CI, 40.3% to 58.9%), respectively. With method 2, a zone diameter of ≤27 mm had a sensitivity of 97.0% (95% CI, 82.5% to 99.8%) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI, 83.3% to 94.9%) for detection of KPC in rectal swab specimens. Direct ertapenem disk testing is simpler, more sensitive, and more specific than selective broth enrichment with imipenem for detection of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli in surveillance specimens.
机译:革兰氏阴性杆菌肺炎克雷伯菌肺炎克雷伯菌(KPC)的生产在世界范围内是一个日益严重的问题。建议将直肠拭子监测作为感染预防计划的一部分,但尚未公布筛查方法。我们比较了通过两种方法在监测标本中检测出生产KPC的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希氏菌的方法:(i)将拭子接种在含有2μg/ ml亚胺培南的胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤中,然后涂于MacConkey琼脂(MAC)(方法1)和( ii)在MAC上划线拭子,然后将10μg厄他培南磁盘放在上面(方法2)。测试了来自一系列特征明确的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌菌株的挑战性分离株的直肠拭子标本,并测试了在7个月内从4个不同的医疗机构从患者那里收集的抢救性直肠拭子标本。金标准比较器是分离株的blaKPC PCR测试。方法1检测到4/9(44%)KPC阳性挑战分离株。通过方法2,9/9 KPC阳性攻击分离株显示出≤27 mm的抑制区;所有KPC阴性分离株均表现出大于27 mm的抑制区。方法1在149个直肠拭子样本中检测KPC阳性肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌的敏感性和特异性分别为65.6%(95%置信区间[CI],46.8%至80.8%)和49.6%(95%CI) ,分别为40.3%至58.9%)。方法2的区域直径≤27mm,对直肠中KPC的检测灵敏度为97.0%(95%CI,82.5%至99.8%)和90.5%(95%CI,83.3%至94.9%)拭子标本。与使用亚胺培南的选择性肉汤富集相比,直接厄他培南纸片测试更容易,更灵敏,更特异性,可用于检测监测标本中生产KPC的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号