首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology >Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials
【2h】

Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials

机译:它在临床实践中有效吗?从某些前瞻性试验中比较临床实践中结肠镜清洁效果与功效的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Adequate bowel preparation is essential for a high-quality colonoscopy. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated bowel preparation protocols, including split-dose and low-volume regimens. However, RCTs are conducted in an ideal, controlled setting, and translation of trial results to clinical practice is challenging. In this study, we compared the quality of bowel preparations of real-world patients from clinical practice with those enrolled in several prospective trials.
机译:充分的肠道准备对于高质量的结肠镜检查至关重要。许多随机对照试验(RCT)研究了肠道准备方案,包括分剂量和小剂量方案。但是,RCT是在理想的受控环境中进行的,将试验结果转化为临床实践具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们将真实世界中来自临床实践的患者肠道准备的质量与参加了一些前瞻性试验的患者进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号