首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Clinical Performance of the PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA Assay in Comparison with That of the Hybrid Capture 2 Test for Identification of Women at Risk of Cervical Cancer
【2h】

Clinical Performance of the PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA Assay in Comparison with That of the Hybrid Capture 2 Test for Identification of Women at Risk of Cervical Cancer

机译:PreTect HPV-Proofer E6 / E7 mRNA检测与杂合Capture 2检测的临床性能相比可鉴定具有宫颈癌危险的女性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing has a higher clinical sensitivity than cytology for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN 2+). However, an improvement in specificity would be desirable. As malignant transformation is induced by HPV E6/E7 oncogenes, detection of E6/E7 oncogene activity may improve specificity and be more predictive of cervical cancer risk. The PreTect HPV-Proofer assay (Proofer; Norchip) detects E6/E7 mRNA transcripts from HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 with simultaneous genotype-specific identification. The clinical performance of this assay was assessed in a cross-sectional study of women referred for colposcopy in comparison with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Qiagen) test, which detects DNA of 13 high-risk oncogenic HPV types collectively. Cervical specimens were collected in PreservCyt, and cytology was performed using the ThinPrep method (Hologic). The samples were processed for HPV detection with Proofer and HC2 and genotyping with the Linear Array method (Roche Molecular Systems). Histology-confirmed CIN 2+ served as the disease endpoint to assess the clinical performance of the tests. A total of 1,551 women were studied, and of these, 402 (25.9%) were diagnosed with CIN 2+ on histology. The Proofer assay showed a sensitivity of 78.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.1 to 82.1) versus 95.8% (95% CI, 93.8 to 97.8) for HC2 (P < 0.05) and a specificity of 75.5% (95% CI, 73.0 to 78.0) versus 39.6% (95% CI, 36.8 to 42.4), respectively (P < 0.05). The lower sensitivity and higher specificity of Proofer for detection of CIN 2+ can be attributed to the fact that this test detects the expression of E6/E7 genes beyond a threshold from a limited number of oncogenic HPV types. In conclusion, Proofer is more specific than HC2 in identifying women with CIN 2+ but has a lower sensitivity.
机译:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测比细胞学检测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变或更严重(CIN 2+)的临床敏感性更高。但是,需要特异性的改善。由于HPV E6 / E7癌基因可诱发恶性转化,因此检测E6 / E7癌基因活性可提高特异性,并更有可能预测子宫颈癌的风险。 PreTect HPV-Proofer分析(Proofer; Norchip)可检测HPV 16、18、31、33和45型的E6 / E7 mRNA转录物,同时进行基因型特异性鉴定。与Hybrid Capture 2(HC2; Qiagen)测试相比,这项针对阴道镜检查妇女的横断面研究对这项测定的临床性能进行了评估,该测试可共同检测13种高致癌性HPV类型的DNA。在PreservCyt中收集宫颈标本,并使用ThinPrep方法(Hologic)进行细胞学检查。使用Proofer和HC2对样品进行HPV检测,并使用线性阵列方法(Roche Molecular Systems)进行基因分型。经组织学确认的CIN 2+可作为疾病终点,以评估测试的临床表现。总共对1,551名女性进行了研究,其中402名(25.9%)在组织学上被诊断为CIN 2+。 Proofer分析显示对HC2的敏感性为78.1%(95%置信区间[CI],74.1至82.1),而灵敏度为95.8%(95%CI,93.8至97.8),特异性为75.5%(95%)。 CI,分别为73.0至78.0)和39.6%(95%CI,36.8至42.4)(P <0.05)。 Proofer检测CIN 2+的较低灵敏度和较高特异性可以归因于这一事实,即该检测方法从有限数量的致癌HPV类型中检测到超过阈值的E6 / E7基因表达。总之,在识别CIN 2+的女性中,Proofer比HC2更特异性,但敏感性较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号