首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Intensive Care Medicine Experimental >Combination of cardiac and thoracic pump theories in rodent cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a new method of three-side chest compression
【2h】

Combination of cardiac and thoracic pump theories in rodent cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a new method of three-side chest compression

机译:结合心胸泵理论进行啮齿动物心肺复苏:三侧胸部按压的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The evaluation related to the intrathoracic pressure during chest compression ( – ) and the evaluation related to the cardiac output during chest compression ( , ) This figure shows the endotracheal airway pressure compared among the three groups. The results are shown as mean ± SD. †† < 0.01 compared with the 1-side group. ** < 0.01 compared with the 2-side group. The esophageal pressure. The results are shown as mean ± SD. †† < 0.01 compared with the 1-side group. ** < 0.01 compared with the 2-side group. The central venous pressure. The results are shown as mean ± SD. †† < 0.01 compared with 1-side group. * < 0.05 compared with the 2-side group. ** < 0.01 compared with the 2-side group. The left ventricular pressure. The results are shown as mean ± SD. ** < 0.01 compared with the 2-side group. The ratio of stroke volume compared with the baseline. The results are shown as mean ± SD. † < 0.05 compared with 1-side group
机译:与胸部按压期间胸腔内压力相关的评估(–)和与胸部按压过程中心输出量相关的评估(,)此图显示了三组患者气管内气道压力的比较。结果显示为平均值±SD。与1侧组比较,††<0.01。 ** <0.01与2侧组相比。食道压力。结果显示为平均值±SD。与1侧组比较,††<0.01。 ** <0.01与2侧组相比。中心静脉压。结果显示为平均值±SD。与1侧组比较,††<0.01。与2侧组相比* * 0.05。 ** <0.01与2侧组相比。左心室压力。结果显示为平均值±SD。 ** <0.01与2侧组相比。中风量与基线的比值。结果显示为平均值±SD。 †<0.05与1组比较

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号