首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Methodological Quality of Manuscripts Reporting on the Usability of Mobile Applications for Pain Assessment and Management: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Methodological Quality of Manuscripts Reporting on the Usability of Mobile Applications for Pain Assessment and Management: A Systematic Review

机译:报告用于疼痛评估和管理的移动应用程序可用性的手稿方法学质量:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: There has been increasing use of mobile mHealth applications, including pain assessment and pain self-management apps. The usability of mHealth applications has vital importance as it affects the quality of apps. Thus, usability assessment with methodological rigor is essential to minimize errors and undesirable consequences, as well as to increase user acceptance. Objective: this study aimed to synthesize and evaluate existing studies on the assessment of the usability of pain-related apps using a newly developed scale. Methods: an electronic search was conducted in several databases, combining relevant keywords. Then titles and abstracts were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria. The eligible studies were retrieved and independently screened for inclusion by two authors. Disagreements were resolved by discussion until consensus was reached. Results: a total of 31 articles were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment revealed that most manuscripts did not assess usability using valid instruments or triangulation of methods of usability assessment. Most manuscripts also failed to assess the three domains of usability (effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction). Conclusions: future studies should consider existing guidelines on usability assessment design, development and assessment of pain-related apps.
机译:背景:移动mHealth应用程序的使用不断增加,包括疼痛评估和疼痛自我管理应用程序。 mHealth应用程序的可用性至关重要,因为它会影响应用程序的质量。因此,使用严格的方法进行可用性评估对于最小化错误和不良后果以及提高用户接受度至关重要。目的:本研究旨在使用新开发的量表对疼痛相关应用程序的可用性评估进行综合和评估。方法:在几个数据库中进行电子搜索,结合相关关键词。然后根据纳入和排除标准筛选标题和摘要。检索了合格的研究,并由两名作者独立筛选以纳入研究。通过讨论解决分歧,直到达成共识。结果:总共31篇文章符合纳入条件。质量评估表明,大多数手稿没有使用有效的工具或可用性评估方法的三角测量来评估可用性。大多数手稿也未能评估可用性的三个领域(有效性,效率和满意度)。结论:未来的研究应考虑有关疼痛评估应用程序的可用性评估设计,开发和评估的现有指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号