首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Effects of Vibrotactile Feedback on Sedentary Behaviors in Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Effects of Vibrotactile Feedback on Sedentary Behaviors in Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:触觉反馈对成年人久坐行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

No effective and easily implemented intervention strategies for reducing sedentary behavior have been established. This pilot trial (UMIN000024372) investigated whether vibrotactile feedback reduces sedentary behavior. Twenty-six adults aged 30–69 years who were sedentary ≥8 h/day were randomly assigned to control ( = 13) or vibration ( = 13) groups. Participants wore a monitor 9 h daily for seven-day periods at baseline (week zero), during the intervention (weeks one, three, five, and seven), and after the intervention (week eight). During the eight-week intervention, vibration-group participants were notified by a vibration through the monitor whenever continuous sedentary time reached ≥30 min; they also received weekly reports of their sedentary patterns. Control-group participants did not receive feedback. The primary outcome was change in total sedentary time. Changes in longer bouts of sedentary time (≥35 min) were also assessed. No significant difference was found in the change in total sedentary time (control: −17.5 min/9 h, vibration: −9.1 min/9 h; = 0.42). Although no significant differences were observed in sedentary time in longer bouts, vibration-group participants exhibited significantly lower sedentary time (–21.6 min/9 h, = 0.045). Thus, vibration feedback does not appear to offer any advantages in reducing total sedentary time.
机译:还没有建立有效且易于实施的减少久坐行为的干预策略。该试验性试验(UMIN000024372)研究了触觉反馈是否会减少久坐行为。每天久坐≥8 h的二十六名30-69岁的成年人被随机分为对照组(= 13)或振动(= 13)组。参与者在基线期间(零周),干预期间(第一周,第三周,第五周和第七周)以及干预后(第八周)每天9小时佩戴监测仪,持续7天。在为期八周的干预过程中,只要连续久坐时间达到或超过30分钟,振动组的参与者就会通过监视器收到振动通知。他们还每周收到有关其久坐模式的报告。对照组参与者未收到反馈。主要结果是总久坐时间的改变。还评估了久坐时间(≥35分钟)的变化。久坐时间的总变化无明显差异(对照:-17.5分钟/ 9小时,振动:-9.1分钟/ 9小时; = 0.42)。虽然在较长的回合中久坐时间没有观察到显着差异,但振动组参与者的久坐时间明显缩短(–21.6 min / 9 h,= 0.045)。因此,振动反馈在减少总久坐时间方面似乎没有任何优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号