首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Individual Preference Framework or Group Preference Framework? Which Will Regulate the Impact Path of Product Facilities on Residents’ Waste-Sorting Behavior Better
【2h】

Individual Preference Framework or Group Preference Framework? Which Will Regulate the Impact Path of Product Facilities on Residents’ Waste-Sorting Behavior Better

机译:个人偏好框架还是群体偏好框架?它将更好地调节产品设施对居民废物分类行为的影响路径

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To effectively deal with the waste management problems faced by cities, it is of great significance to promote the sorting and recycling of municipal solid waste. Given the correlation between individual behavior and psychological preferences and external situations, this study explored the mechanism of individual preference framework and group preference framework in the impact path of product facilities on residents’ waste-sorting behavior. Based on a questionnaire survey ( = 1505), combined with correlation analysis, difference analysis, hierarchical regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, and other methods, the study found that differences in residents’ age, education background, and monthly income lead to differences in residents’ sorting behaviors, and individuals of young age and low monthly income have higher sorting behaviors than others. Interestingly, highly educated individuals did not show high sorting behavior. Both individual preference and group preference frameworks play a regulating role in the influence path of product facilities on waste-sorting behavior, but a group preference framework (including family preference, organizational preference and social preference) plays the more significant regulating role. Additionally, social preference variables are the most prominent regulatory factors and have a greater “amplifier” effect in the impact of product facilities on waste-sorting behavior. Based on these findings, this study identifies the corresponding policy implications.
机译:为了有效处理城市面临的废物管理问题,促进城市生活垃圾的分类和回收具有重要意义。考虑到个人行为与心理偏好及外部环境之间的相关性,本研究探索了产品设施对居民垃圾分类行为的影响路径中的个人偏好框架和群体偏好框架的机制。在一项问卷调查(= 1505)的基础上,结合相关分析,差异分析,层次回归分析,敏感性分析和其他方法,研究发现居民年龄,教育背景和月收入的差异导致居民的差异的分类行为,并且年龄较小且月收入较低的人的分类行为要比其他人高。有趣的是,受过良好教育的个人没有表现出较高的分类行为。个人偏好和群体偏好框架在产品设施对废物分类行为的影响路径中均起着调节作用,而群体偏好框架(包括家庭偏好,组织偏好和社会偏好)则起着更为重要的调节作用。此外,社会偏好变量是最主要的监管因素,并且在产品设施对废物分类行为的影响中具有更大的“放大”效应。基于这些发现,本研究确定了相应的政策含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号