首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Maternal and Child Health and AIDS >COVID-19 Pandemic: Marked Global Disparities in Fatalities According to Geographic Location and Universal Health Care
【2h】

COVID-19 Pandemic: Marked Global Disparities in Fatalities According to Geographic Location and Universal Health Care

机译:COVID-19大流行:根据地理位置和全民医疗保健全球死亡人数存在明显差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since its outbreak, COVID-19 pandemic has been the biggest global concern with exponentially increasing number of cases and associated deaths across all habitable continents. Various countries around the world with their diverse health care systems, have responded to the pandemic in very distinctive ways. In this paper, we: compared COVID-19 mortality rates across global geographic regions; and assessed differences in COVID-19-related case fatality rate (CFR) based on presence or absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC). We found that as of May 6, 2020, Europe had experienced the highest CFR globally of 9.6%, followed by 5.9% in North America. Although the pandemic originated in Asia, the continent ranked second to the last in terms of CFR (3.5%). Countries with UHC had lower number of cases of 37.6%, but the CFR of countries with UHC was twice that of countries without UHC (10.5% versus 4.9%). In conclusion, UHC does not appear to protect against mortality in a pandemic environment such as with COVID-19.
机译:自爆发以来,COVID-19大流行一直是全球最大的关注点,在所有宜居大陆上,病例数和相关死亡人数呈指数增长。世界各地的各国都有其多样化的医疗保健系统,以非常独特的方式应对了这一大流行。在本文中,我们:比较了全球地理区域的COVID-19死亡率;并根据是否存在全民健康保险(UHC)评估了COVID-19相关病死率(CFR)的差异。我们发现,截至2020年5月6日,欧洲的CFR达到了全球最高的9.6%,其次是北美的5.9%。尽管大流行起源于亚洲,但按病死率计算,非洲大陆排名第二(3.5%)。具有UHC的国家的病例数较少,为37.6%,但是具有UHC的国家的病死率是没有UHC的国家的两倍(10.5%对4.9%)。总之,UHC在大流行环境(例如COVID-19)中似乎无法防止死亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号