首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Feasibility of a Molecular Screening Method for Detection of Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni in a Routine Community-Based Clinical Microbiology Laboratory
【2h】

Feasibility of a Molecular Screening Method for Detection of Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni in a Routine Community-Based Clinical Microbiology Laboratory

机译:在常规的基于社区的临床微生物学实验室中检测肠炎沙门氏菌和空肠弯曲菌的分子筛查方法的可行性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni are laborious and time-consuming procedures, resulting in final results, for the majority of specimens, only after 3 to 4 days. Molecular detection can improve the time to reporting of the final results from several days to the next day. However, molecular assays for the detection of gastrointestinal pathogens directly from stool specimens have not made it into the routine clinical microbiology laboratory. In this study we have assessed the feasibility of a real-time PCR-based molecular screening method (MSM), aimed at S. enterica and C. jejuni, in the daily practice of a routine clinical microbiology laboratory. We have prospectively analyzed 2,067 stool specimens submitted for routine detection of gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens over a 7-month period. The MSM showed 98 to 100% sensitivity but routine culture showed only 77.8 to 86.8% sensitivity when an extended “gold standard” that included all culture-positive and all MSM-positive specimens, as confirmed by an independent secondary PCR of a different target gene, was used. An overall improvement in the rate of detection of both pathogens of 15 to 18% was observed. Both approaches performed nearly identically with regard to the specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, with the values for MSM being 99.7%, 93.1 to 96.6%, and 99.8 to 100%, respectively, and those for routine culture being 100%, 100%, and 97.6 to 99.5%, respectively. Finally, the final results were reported between 3 and 4 days earlier for negative specimens compared to the time of reporting of the results of routine culture. Positive specimens, on the other hand, required an additional 2 days to obtain a final result compared to the time required for routine culture, although preliminary MSM PCR-positive results were reported, on average, 2.9 to 3.8 days before the final routine culture results were reported. In conclusion, MSM can be incorporated into the daily practice of a routine clinical microbiology laboratory with ease. Furthermore, it provides an improvement in the screening for S. enterica and C. jejuni and substantially improves the time to the reporting of negative results.
机译:用于检测肠炎沙门氏菌和空肠弯曲菌的常规诊断方法既费力又费时,只能在3到4天后对大多数标本产生最终结果。分子检测可以缩短从几天到第二天报告最终结果的时间。然而,直接从粪便标本中检测胃肠道病原体的分子测定法并未将其纳入常规临床微生物学实验室。在这项研究中,我们评估了在常规临床微生物实验室的日常操作中,针对小肠链球菌和空肠弯曲菌的基于PCR的实时分子筛查方法(MSM)的可行性。我们前瞻性地分析了2067个粪便标本,这些标本用于在7个月的时间内常规检测胃肠道细菌病原体。 MSM显示98至100%的敏感性,但常规的培养物在扩展的“金标准”中仅显示77.8至86.8%的敏感性,其中包括所有培养阳性和所有MSM阳性标本,通过不同靶基因的独立二次PCR证实,已被使用。两种病原体的检出率总体提高了15%至18%。两种方法在特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值方面的表现几乎相同,MSM的值分别为99.7%,93.1至96.6%和99.8至100%,常规培养的值为100% ,100%和97.6至99.5%。最后,与报告常规培养结果的时间相比,阴性样品的最终结果要提前3-4天报告。另一方面,阳性标本与常规培养相比需要另外2天才能获得最终结果,尽管据报道初步MSM PCR阳性结果平均要比常规培养前晚2.9至3.8天被报道。总之,MSM可以轻松地纳入常规临床微生物实验室的日常操作中。此外,它改善了对肠炎链球菌和空肠弯曲杆菌的筛选,并显着缩短了报告阴性结果的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号