首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>G3: GenesGenomesGenetics >Efficiency of a Constrained Linear Genomic Selection Index To Predict the Net Genetic Merit in Plants
【2h】

Efficiency of a Constrained Linear Genomic Selection Index To Predict the Net Genetic Merit in Plants

机译:约束线性基因组选择指数预测植物净遗传优势的效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The constrained linear genomic selection index (CLGSI) is a linear combination of genomic estimated breeding values useful for predicting the net genetic merit, which in turn is a linear combination of true unobservable breeding values of the traits weighted by their respective economic values. The CLGSI is the most general genomic index and allows imposing constraints on the expected genetic gain per trait to make some traits change their mean values based on a predetermined level, while the rest of them remain without restrictions. In addition, it includes the unconstrained linear genomic index as a particular case. Using two real datasets and simulated data for seven selection cycles, we compared the theoretical results of the CLGSI with the theoretical results of the constrained linear phenotypic selection index (CLPSI). The criteria used to compare CLGSI CLPSI efficiency were the estimated expected genetic gain per trait values, the selection response, and the interval between selection cycles. The results indicated that because the interval between selection cycles is shorter for the CLGSI than for the CLPSI, CLGSI is more efficient than CLPSI per unit of time, but its efficiency could be lower per selection cycle. Thus, CLGSI is a good option for performing genomic selection when there are genotyped candidates for selection.
机译:约束线性基因组选择指数(CLGSI)是可用于预测净遗传价值的基因组估计育种值的线性组合,而反过来又是由其各自经济价值加权的性状的真正不可观察育种值的线性组合。 CLGSI是最通用的基因组指数,它允许对每个性状的预期遗传增益施加限制,以使某些性状根据预定水平更改其平均值,而其余性状则不受限制。另外,作为特殊情况,它包括不受约束的线性基因组指数。使用两个真实数据集和七个选择周期的模拟数据,我们将CLGSI的理论结果与约束线性表型选择指数(CLPSI)的理论结果进行了比较。用于比较CLGSI CLPSI效率的标准是每个性状估计的预期遗传增益值,选择反应以及选择周期之间的间隔。结果表明,由于CLGSI的选择周期之间的间隔比CLPSI的短,因此CLGSI的单位时间效率比CLPSI高,但每个选择周期的效率可能较低。因此,当有基因型候选者选择时,CLGSI是执行基因组选择的好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号