首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Translational Science >3575 Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community Based Organizations: Field Testing of the Community Research Activity Assessment Tool (CREAT)
【2h】

3575 Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community Based Organizations: Field Testing of the Community Research Activity Assessment Tool (CREAT)

机译:3575评估社区组织的研究活动和能力:社区研究活动评估工具(CREAT)的现场测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: 1. To assess the acceptability and feasibility and of an online self-assessment version of the Community REsearch Activity Assessment Tool (CREAT), an instrument to measure research capacity of CBOs. 2. To elicit CBO perspectives on their research and knowledge generation activities. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Thirteen CBOs who had previously partnered with an academic course on practice-based community health research were contacted and asked to participate in the field testing of the CREAT and provide feedback on areas of strength and areas for potential improvement. Eleven organizations completed the field testing, which began and ended with an in-person semi-structured interview with the online self-administration of the CREAT in the middle. The semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded with questions pertaining to topics such as: strengths and challenges of previous academic research partnerships, perceptions around the importance of research within the organization, thoughts and reactions to the CREAT, and general feedback about the CREAT. Results from the self-administered CREAT were used to test a scoring algorithm. Semi-structured interviews are being transcribed, pre-post responses to questions of strengths and challenges in engaging in research partnerships will be compared, and overall qualitative transcripts will be coded using grounded theory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Anticipated Results: The CREAT was acceptable and self-administration was feasible. Average time for completion of the online CREAT was 41 ± 13 min, and respondents did not need assistance from the interviewer to complete the online instrument. Suggestions for improvements focused on word choices and scale options. Respondents were aware of the importance of research activities for their CBOs, particularly for optimizing programmatic quality and services. Access to staff and financial resources were key barriers to strengthening research capacity, and respondents noted that engaging in research partnerships can also bring in additional resources. Interview transcription is still in progress along with the refinement of the codebook for the qualitative data collected. In alignment with objectives/goals outlined above, the results will be separated into the following four sections: CBO Research and Knowledge Generation Activities, Acceptability of the Tool, Feasibility of the Tool, and Refinement of the Tool. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The online, self-administered CREAT instrument is acceptable and feasible for CBO respondents. Availability of a validated tool to assess research capacity of CBOs, developed and refined with input from community researchers, will support targeted research capacity building for CTSAs, community organizations and partners, thus strengthening collaborations. Translational scientists, public health systems and community health improvement depend on CBOs as partners in community-engaged research (CEnR). The CREAT will allow community members to more fully contribute their expertise to the development, implementation and evaluation of interventions, and to develop more equitable partnerships with researchers.
机译:目标/特定目的:1.评估社区研究活动评估工具(CREAT)的在线自我评估版本的可接受性和可行性,这是一种衡量社区组织研究能力的工具。 2.激发CBO对其研究和知识创造活动的看法。方法/研究人群:之前曾与13个基于实践的社区健康研究学术课程合作过的CBO被联系,并被要求参加CREAT的现场测试,并提供有关力量领域和潜在改进领域的反馈。有11个组织完成了现场测试,该测试的开始和结束是对中间人CREAT在线自我管理的亲自半结构式访谈。半结构化访谈记录了与以下主题有关的问题,这些问题包括:以前的学术研究合作伙伴关系的优势和挑战,对组织内部研究重要性的看法,对CREAT的想法和反应以及对CREAT的一般反馈。自我管理的CREAT的结果用于测试评分算法。目前正在转录半结构式访谈,将比较对参与研究合作伙伴关系中的优势和挑战的事前答复,并使用扎根的理论对总体定性笔录进行编码。结果/预期结果:预期结果:CREAT可接受,自我给药是可行的。完成在线CREAT的平均时间为41±13分钟,受访者不需要访问员的帮助即可完成在线工具。改进建议集中在单词选择和比例选项上。受访者意识到研究活动对其CBO的重要性,特别是对于优化程序质量和服务的重要性。获得工作人员和财政资源是加强研究能力的主要障碍,受访者指出,开展研究伙伴关系也可以带来更多资源。采访记录仍在进行中,同时对收集的定性数据的密码本进行了完善。与上述目标/目标一致,结果将分为以下四个部分:CBO研究和知识生成活动,工具的可接受性,工具的可行性和工具的完善。讨论/意义:CBO被调查者可以接受在线可行的CREAT工具。利用社区研究人员的意见开发和完善的,经过验证的评估CBO研究能力的工具将为CTSA,社区组织和合作伙伴提供有针对性的研究能力建设,从而加强合作。转化科学家,公共卫生系统和社区健康改善都依赖CBO作为社区参与研究(CEnR)的合作伙伴。 CREAT将允许社区成员在干预措施的制定,实施和评估中更充分地贡献自己的专业知识,并与研究人员建立更公平的伙伴关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号