首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Recovery of Blood Culture Isolates from Two BacT/ALERT FAN Aerobic Blood Culture Bottles with Recovery from One FAN Aerobic Bottle and One FAN Anaerobic Bottle
【2h】

Comparison of Recovery of Blood Culture Isolates from Two BacT/ALERT FAN Aerobic Blood Culture Bottles with Recovery from One FAN Aerobic Bottle and One FAN Anaerobic Bottle

机译:从两个BacT / ALERT FAN有氧血培养瓶中回收血培养分离物与从一个FAN有氧瓶和一个FAN厌氧瓶中回收血培养物的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Traditionally, a routine blood culture for adult patients consisted of paired aerobic and anaerobic bottles, but the routine use of an anaerobic blood culture bottle has been challenged in recent years. In this study, we compared the recovery of two FAN aerobic bottles with one FAN aerobic and one FAN anaerobic bottle. Each pair of bottles was collected by a separate collection procedure, and each bottle held a recommended 8- to 12-ml draw. A total of 704 clinically significant isolates were recovered from 8,620 sets (17,240 pairs), with 487 (69.2%) isolates recovered from one or both bottles in each pair of bottles, 86 isolates (12.2%) recovered only from the FAN aerobic-FAN aerobic pair, and 131 isolates (18.6%) recovered only from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair. Significantly more total organisms (P = 0.002), gram-positive cocci (P = 0.03), Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.05), Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli (P = 0.02), and anaerobes (P = 0.01) were recovered from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair than from the FAN aerobic-FAN aerobic pair. A separate analysis was performed on the 618 isolates that were recovered from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair to compare recovery by bottle type. Significantly more S. aureus (P = 0.005) and anaerobes (P < 0.001) were recovered from the FAN anaerobic bottle, while significantly more coagulase-negative staphylococci (P = 0.01), Streptococcus pneumoniae (P = 0.03), and other gram-negative bacilli (P = 0.004) were recovered from the FAN aerobic bottle. These results support the routine use of a FAN anaerobic bottle for use in the culture of blood with the BacT/ALERT system in our institution. These results also suggest that the decision of whether to routinely utilize an anaerobic blood culture bottle should be influenced by the overall recovery of bacteria and yeast, the recovery of specific types of bacteria or yeast, the medium type, and the blood culture system utilized by the laboratory.
机译:传统上,成年患者的常规血液培养由有氧和厌氧瓶配对组成,但是近年来厌氧血液培养瓶的常规使用受到了挑战。在这项研究中,我们比较了两个FAN好氧瓶与一个FAN好氧瓶和一个FAN厌氧瓶的回收率。每对瓶子均通过单独的收集程序进行收集,每瓶建议抽8至12毫升。从8,620套(17,240对)中总共回收了704个临床上重要的分离株,每对瓶中的一个或两个瓶中回收了487(69.2%)分离株,仅从FAN有氧FAN中回收了86个分离株(12.2%)仅从FAN有氧-FAN厌氧菌对中回收了131株(18.6%)。从大肠杆菌中回收的细菌总数(P = 0.002),革兰氏阳性球菌(P = 0.03),金黄色葡萄球菌(P = 0.05),除大肠埃希菌外的肠杆菌(P = 0.02)和厌氧菌(P = 0.01)。 FAN好氧-FAN厌氧对要比FAN好氧-FAN厌氧对好。对从FAN好氧-FAN无氧菌对中回收的618个分离株进行了单独的分析,以比较瓶型的回收率。从FAN厌氧瓶中回收的金黄色葡萄球菌(P = 0.005)和厌氧菌(P <0.001)显着多,而凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(P = 0.01),肺炎链球菌(P = 0.03)和其他克从FAN好氧瓶中回收了阴性细菌(P = 0.004)。这些结果支持我们机构中BacT / ALERT系统常规使用FAN厌氧瓶进行血液培养。这些结果还表明,是否应常规使用厌氧血培养瓶的决定应受到细菌和酵母菌的总体回收率,特定细菌或酵母菌类型的回收率,培养基类型以及由该公司利用的血液培养系统的影响。实验室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号