首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Genotyping of Francisella tularensis Strains by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Fingerprinting and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
【2h】

Genotyping of Francisella tularensis Strains by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Fingerprinting and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

机译:脉冲场凝胶电泳扩增的片段长度多态性指纹图谱和16S rRNA基因测序对土拉弗朗西斯菌菌株进行基因分型。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We evaluated three molecular methods for identification of Francisella strains: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The analysis was performed with 54 Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica, 5 F. tularensis subsp. tularensis, 2 F. tularensis subsp. novicida, and 1 F. philomiragia strains. On the basis of the combination of results obtained by PFGE with the restriction enzymes XhoI and BamHI, PFGE revealed seven pulsotypes, which allowed us to discriminate the strains to the subspecies level and which even allowed us to discriminate among some isolates of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica. The AFLP analysis technique produced some degree of discrimination among F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains (one primary cluster with three major subclusters and minor variations within subclusters) when EcoRI-C and MseI-A, EcoRI-T and MseI-T, EcoRI-A and MseI-C, and EcoRI-0 and MseI-CA were used as primers. The degree of similarity among the strains was about 94%. The percent similarities of the AFLP profiles of this subspecies compared to those of F. tularensis subsp. tularensis, F. tularensis subsp. novicida, and F. philomiragia were less than 90%, about 72%, and less than 24%, respectively, thus permitting easy differentiation of this subspecies. 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed 100% similarity for all F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolates compared in this study. These results suggest that although limited genetic heterogeneity among F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolates was observed, PFGE and AFLP analysis appear to be promising tools for the diagnosis of infections caused by different subspecies of F. tularensis and suitable techniques for the differentiation of individual strains.
机译:我们评估了三种鉴定弗朗西斯菌菌株的分子方法:脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE),扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)分析和16S rRNA基因测序。使用54个弗朗西斯菌Tularensis亚种进行分析。 holarctica,5 F. tularensis亚种。 tularensis,2 F. tularensis亚种。 Novicida和1个F.philomiragia菌株。根据PFGE与限制酶XhoI和BamHI的结果相结合,PFGE揭示了7个脉冲型,这使我们能够将菌株区分到亚种水平,甚至可以区分出Tularensis亚种的某些分离株。 。 lar AFLP分析技术在T.tularensis亚种之间产生了一定程度的区分。当EcoRI-C和MseI-A, Eco RI-T和 Mse IT,时,Holarctica菌株(一个具有三个主要子簇的主簇,子簇内的微小变异)以Eco RI-A和 Mse IC以及 Eco RI-0和 Mse I-CA为引物。菌株之间的相似度约为94%。与 F相比,该亚种的AFLP配置文件的相似性百分比。 tularensis 子亚种 tularensis F。 tularensis 子亚种 novicida F。 philophragia 分别小于90%,约72%和小于24%,从而使该亚种易于区分。 16S rRNA基因测序揭示了所有 F的100%相似性。 tularensis 子亚种本研究中比较了 holarctica 菌株。这些结果表明,尽管 F之间的遗传异质性有限。 tularensis 子亚种观察到了 holarctica 分离株,PFGE和AFLP分析似乎是诊断 F不同亚种引起的感染的有前途的工具。 tularensis 以及用于区分单个菌株的合适技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号