首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventive Medicine Reports >Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers
【2h】

Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers

机译:使用基于社区的参与性研究和组织诊断来表征社区领导者与学术研究人员之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sustaining collaborations between community-based organization leaders and academic researchers in community-engaged research (CEnR) in the service of decreasing health inequities necessitates understanding the collaborations from an inter-organizational perspective. We assessed the perspectives of community leaders and university-based researchers conducting community-engaged research in a medium-sized city with a history of community-university tension. Our research team, included experts in CEnR and organizational theory, used qualitative methods and purposeful, snowball sampling to recruit local participants and performed key informant interviews from July 2011–May 2012. A community-based researcher interviewed 11 community leaders, a university-based researcher interviewed 12 university-based researchers. We interviewed participants until we reached thematic saturation and performed analyses using the constant comparative method. Unifying themes characterizing community leaders and university-based researchers' relationships on the inter-organizational level include: 1) Both groups described that community-engaged university-based researchers are exceptions to typical university culture; 2) Both groups described that the interpersonal skills university-based researchers need for CEnR require a change in organizational culture and training; 3) Both groups described skepticism about the sustainability of a meaningful institutional commitment to community-engaged research 4) Both groups described the historical impact on research relationships of race, power, and privilege, but only community leaders described its persistent role and relevance in research relationships. Challenges to community-academic research partnerships include researcher interpersonal skills and different perceptions of the importance of organizational history. Solutions to improve research partnerships may include transforming university culture and community-university discussions on race, power, and privilege.
机译:为了减少健康不平等,要在社区参与型研究(CEnR)中维持社区组织负责人和学术研究人员之间的合作,就必须从组织间的角度来理解这种合作。我们评估了社区领导人和大学研究人员在具有社区大学紧张历史的中型城市中开展社区参与研究的观点。我们的研究团队包括CEnR和组织理论方面的专家,使用定性方法和有目的的雪球采样来招募本地参与者,并于2011年7月至2012年5月进行了关键的知情人访谈。一位社区研究人员访问了11位社区领袖,这是一所大学研究人员采访了12位大学研究人员。我们采访了参与者,直到达到主题饱和,并使用恒定比较方法进行了分析。在组织间层面上,表征社区领导者和大学研究人员之间的关系的统一主题包括:1)两组都描述了社区参与的大学研究人员是典型大学文化的例外; 2)两组均表示,大学研究人员对CEnR的人际交往能力要求改变组织文化和培训; 3)两组都对对有意义的机构承诺对社区参与型研究的可持续性持怀疑态度4)两组均描述了种族,权力和特权对研究关系的历史影响,但只有社区领导者描述了其在研究中的持久作用和相关性关系。社区与学术研究合作的挑战包括研究人员的人际交往能力以及对组织历史重要性的不同认识。改善研究伙伴关系的解决方案可能包括转变大学文化和关于种族,权力和特权的社区大学讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号