首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Use of PCR and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Techniques for Differentiation of Prevotella intermedia Sensu Stricto and Prevotella nigrescens
【2h】

Use of PCR and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Techniques for Differentiation of Prevotella intermedia Sensu Stricto and Prevotella nigrescens

机译:PCR和十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳技术用于区分中间型小菜蛾和黑头菜

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Primers were designed from 16S rRNA sequences of Prevotella intermedia sensu stricto and Prevotella nigrescens and were used to discriminate these two species by PCR. The results were compared with those from the PCR technique using primers designed from arbitrarily primed PCR products by Guillot and Mouton (E. Guillot and C. Mouton, J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1876–1882, 1997). The specificities of both assays were studied by using P. intermedia ATCC 25611, P. nigrescens ATCC 33563, 174 clinical isolates of P. intermedia sensu lato, and 59 reference strains and 58 clinical isolates of other Prevotella species and/or common oral flora. In addition, the usefulness and reliability of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in the differentiation of the two species were examined by comparing the results with those from PCR assays. The controversial lipase test for distinguishing these species was also carried out. Unambiguous differentiation was made by both PCR assays, and the results matched each other. The SDS-PAGE assay was found to misidentify a few strains tested, compared with the results of PCR assays. The lipase test was positive for both species, including the reference strains of P. intermedia and P. nigrescens. We conclude that both PCR assays are simple, rapid, reliable, and specific methods which could be used in clinical studies and that the lipase test is not valuable in the differentiation. The reliable discrimination of the two species by SDS-PAGE is questionable.
机译:从中间小球藻和黑球藻的16S rRNA序列设计引物,并通过PCR区分这两个物种。将该结果与使用由Guillot和Mouton任意引物的PCR产物设计的引物进行PCR的结果进行了比较(E. Guillot和C. Mouton,J。Clin。Microbiol。35:1876–1882,1997)。两种方法的特异性均通过使用中间假单胞菌ATCC 25611,黑假单胞菌ATCC 33563,中间假单胞菌174株临床分离株,59株参考菌株和58种其他普氏杆菌和/或常见口腔菌群的临床分离株进行了研究。此外,通过将结果与PCR分析的结果进行比较,研究了十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)在两种物种分化中的有用性和可靠性。还进行了用于区分这些物种的有争议的脂肪酶测试。两种PCR分析均进行了明确的区分,结果相互匹配。与PCR测定的结果相比,发现SDS-PAGE测定误识别了一些测试菌株。两种物种的脂肪酶测试均呈阳性,包括中间菌株(P. intermedia)和黑霉菌(P. nigrescens)的参考菌株。我们得出的结论是,这两种PCR检测方法都是简单,快速,可靠且特定的方法,可用于临床研究,并且脂肪酶检测对鉴别没有价值。通过SDS-PAGE对这两种物种的可靠区分令人怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号