首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Protocol: Arthroscopic meniscectomy versus non-surgical or sham treatment in patients with MRI confirmed degenerative meniscus lesions: a protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis
【2h】

Protocol: Arthroscopic meniscectomy versus non-surgical or sham treatment in patients with MRI confirmed degenerative meniscus lesions: a protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis

机译:方案:关节镜半月板切除术与非手术或假手术对MRI确诊的退行性半月板病变:单个参与者数据荟萃分析的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) after degenerative meniscus tears is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in orthopaedics. Although several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published that showed no clear benefit compared with sham treatment or non-surgical treatment, the incidence of APM remains high. The common perception by most orthopaedic surgeons is that there are subgroups of patients that need APM to improve, and they argue that each study sample of the existing trials is not representative for the day-to-day patients in the clinic. Therefore, the objective of this individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) is to assess whether there are subgroups of patients with degenerative meniscus lesions who benefit from APM in comparison with non-surgical or sham treatment.
机译:变性半月板撕裂后的关节镜下半月板切除术(APM)是骨科中最常进行的手术之一。尽管已经发表了几项随机对照试验(RCT),显示与假手术或非手术治疗相比没有明显的益处,但APM的发生率仍然很高。大多数骨科医生的普遍看法是,有一些亚组需要改善APM,他们认为现有试验的每个研究样本都不能代表临床中的日常患者。因此,该个体参加者数据荟萃分析(IPDMA)的目的是评估与非手术或假手术相比,是否有APM受益于退行性半月板病变的患者亚组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号