首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Controlled Clinical Comparison of BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F to Standard Anaerobic/F as the Anaerobic Companion Bottle to Plus Aerobic/F Medium for Culturing Blood from Adults
【2h】

Controlled Clinical Comparison of BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F to Standard Anaerobic/F as the Anaerobic Companion Bottle to Plus Aerobic/F Medium for Culturing Blood from Adults

机译:BACTEC Plus厌氧/ F与标准厌氧/ F作为厌氧伴侣瓶与Plus有氧/ F培养基培养成人血液的对照临床比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To determine the optimal anaerobic companion bottle to pair with BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F medium for recovery of pathogenic microorganisms from adult patients with bacteremia and fungemia, we compared Plus Anaerobic/F bottles with Standard Anaerobic/F bottles, each of which was filled with 4 to 6 ml of blood. The two bottles were paired with a Plus Aerobic/F bottle filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 14,011 blood culture sets were obtained. Of these, 11,583 sets were received with all three bottles filled adequately and 12,257 were received with both anaerobic bottles filled adequately. Of 818 clinically important isolates detected in one or both adequately filled anaerobic bottles, significantly more staphylococci (P < 0.001), streptococci (P < 0.005), Escherichia coli isolates (P < 0.02), Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (P < 0.005), and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.001) were detected in Plus Anaerobic/F bottles. In contrast, significantly more anaerobic gram-negative bacilli were detected in Standard Anaerobic/F bottles (P < 0.05). Of 397 unimicrobial episodes of septicemia, 354 were detected with both pairs, 30 were detected with Plus Aerobic/F–Plus Anaerobic/F pairs only, and 13 were detected with Plus Aerobic/F–Standard Anaerobic/F pairs only (P < 0.05). Significantly more episodes of bacteremia caused by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.05) and aerobic and facultative gram-positive bacteria (P < 0.025) were detected with Plus Anaerobic/F bottles only. In a paired-bottle analysis, 810 of 950 isolates were recovered from both pairs, 90 were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F–Plus Anaerobic/F pairs only, and 50 were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F–Standard Anaerobic/F pairs only (P < 0.001). Paired Plus Aerobic/F–Plus Anaerobic/F bottles yielded significantly more staphylococci (P < 0.001), streptococci (P < 0.05), and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P <0.001). We conclude that Plus Anaerobic/F bottles detect more microorganisms and episodes of bacteremia and fungemia than Standard Anaerobic/F bottles as companion bottles to Plus Aerobic/F bottles in the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system.
机译:为了确定与BACTEC Plus好氧/ F培养基配对以从成年菌血症和真菌病患者中回收病原微生物的最佳厌氧伴侣瓶,我们将Plus厌氧/ F瓶与标准厌氧/ F瓶进行了比较,每瓶均装有4个到6毫升血液。将两个瓶子与装有8至12毫升血液的Plus Aerobic / F瓶子配对。总共获得了14011个血液培养集。其中,共收到11583套,三个瓶子都装满了,收到了12257套两个厌氧瓶。在一个或两个装满的厌氧瓶中检测到的818个临床上重要的分离株中,葡萄球菌(P <0.001),链球菌(P <0.005),大肠杆菌分离株(P <0.02),肺炎克雷伯菌分离株(P <0.005)和明显更多在Plus厌氧/ F瓶中检测到所有合并的微生物(P <0.001)。相比之下,在标准厌氧/ F瓶中检出的厌氧革兰氏阴性菌明显更多(P <0.05)。在397次单菌败血症发作中,两对均检测到354次,仅使用Plus Aerobic / F–Plus厌氧/ F对检测到30次,仅使用Plus Aerobic / F–标准厌氧/ F对检测到13次(P <0.05) )。仅使用Plus厌氧/ F瓶检测到更多由肠杆菌科成员引起的菌血症发作(P <0.05)和需氧和兼职革兰氏阳性菌(P <0.025)。在成对瓶分析中,从两对中回收了950个分离株中的810个,仅从Plus Aerobic / F-Plus厌氧/ F对中回收了90个,仅从Plus Aerobic / F-Standard厌氧/ F对中回收了50个( P <0.001)。成对的Plus好氧/ F–Plus厌氧/ F瓶产生的葡萄球菌(P <0.001),链球菌(P <0.05)和肠杆菌科成员( P <0.001)显着增加。我们得出结论,与BACTEC 9240血液培养系统中Plus厌氧/ F瓶作为伴侣瓶相比,Plus厌氧/ F瓶可检测到更多的微生物以及菌血症和真菌病发作,而不是标准厌氧/ F瓶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号