首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Identification of Clinical Isolates of Actinomyces Species by Amplified 16S Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis
【2h】

Identification of Clinical Isolates of Actinomyces Species by Amplified 16S Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis

机译:通过扩增的16S核糖体DNA限制分析鉴定放线菌物种的临床分离株

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Amplified 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) restriction analysis (ARDRA), using enzymes HaeIII and HpaII, was applied to 176 fresh and 299 stored clinical isolates of putative Actinomyces spp. referred to the Anaerobe Reference Unit of the Public Health Laboratory Service for confirmation of identity. Results were compared with ARDRA results obtained previously for reference strains and with conventional phenotypic reactions. Identities of some strains were confirmed by analysis of partial 16S rDNA sequences. Of the 475 isolates, 331 (70%) were clearly assigned to recognized Actinomyces species, including 94 isolates assigned to six recently described species. A further 52 isolates in 12 ARDRA profiles were designated as apparently resembling recognized species, and 44 isolates, in 18 novel profiles, were confirmed as members of genera other than Actinomyces. The identities of 48 isolates in nine profiles remain uncertain, and they may represent novel species of Actinomyces. For the majority of species, phenotypic results, published reactions for the species, and ARDRA profiles concurred. However, of 113 stored isolates originally identified as A. meyeri or resembling A. meyeri by phenotypic tests, only 21 were confirmed as A. meyeri by ARDRA; 63 were reassigned as A. turicensis, 7 as other recognized species, and 22 as unidentified actinomycetes. Analyses of incidence and clinical associations of Actinomyces spp. add to the currently sparse knowledge of some recently described species.
机译:使用HaeIII和HpaII酶对16S核糖体DNA(rDNA)限制性酶切分析(ARDRA)进行了176株新鲜和299株假定放线菌属的临床分离株的分析。请转交给公共卫生实验室服务的Anaerobe参考单位以确认身份。将结果与先前针对参考菌株获得的ARDRA结果以及常规表型反应进行比较。通过分析部分16S rDNA序列确认了某些菌株的身份。在这475个分离物中,有331个(70%)被明确分配给公认的放线菌菌种,其中94个分离物被分配给了六个最近描述的菌种。 12个ARDRA谱中的另外52个分离株被指定为明显类似于公认的物种,并且18个新谱中的44个分离株被确认为除放线菌属之外的属。在九个谱图中的48个分离株的身份仍然不确定,它们可能代表放线菌的新物种。对于大多数物种,表型结果,该物种的已发表反应和ARDRA档案均获同意。然而,在通过表型测试最初鉴定为迈耶曲霉或类似于迈耶曲霉的113种保藏菌株中,ARDRA仅确认了21种为迈耶曲霉。 63例被重新分配为土。曲霉,7例被重新分配为其他公认种,22例被重新分配为未鉴定的放线菌。放线菌属的发生率和临床关联性分析。增加了一些最近描述的物种的当前稀疏知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号