首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventive Medicine Reports >A randomized controlled trial in Norwegian pharmacies on effects of risk alert and advice in people with elevated cardiovascular risk
【2h】

A randomized controlled trial in Norwegian pharmacies on effects of risk alert and advice in people with elevated cardiovascular risk

机译:挪威药房的一项随机对照试验对心血管风险增高的人的风险提示和建议产生了影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated if alerting subjects to elevated total cholesterol (TC), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP) (cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors that are usually asymptomatic), and if providing advice would result in reduced risk. We conducted a multicenter (50 community pharmacies) parallel three-arm 8-week randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 52-week follow-up visit. During six days of screening, TC, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, BP and body mass index (BMI) were assessed in 1318 individuals. Of these, 582 with a measured and predefined elevated ad hoc CVD risk score were randomized to either Alert/advice (n = 198) (immediately alerted of their screening result and received healthy lifestyle-advice), Advice-only (n = 185) (received only advice) or Control (n = 199) (not alert, no advice). Changes in risk score and self-reported health-related behaviors (diet, alcohol, physical activity) were assessed in pharmacies after 8 weeks (N = 543; 93%). Although the primary analysis showed no significant difference between groups, the Control group had the largest reduction in risk score of 14%. The total (uncontrolled) sample (N = 543) reduced the risk score by 3.2% beyond estimated regression towards the mean and improved their health-related behaviors. Among the 65% (n = 377) who returned 52 weeks after baseline, 14% reported started using CVD preventive medication after the screening. The study demonstrated that while assessing risk factors and behaviors in pharmacies proved efficient and possibly led to a small risk decrease, alerting people to their screening result did not seem to be more effective than a self-directed approach. identifier: .
机译:我们调查了是否提醒受试者总胆固醇(TC),血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)和血压(BP)升高(通常是无症状的心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素)升高,以及是否提供建议可降低风险。我们进行了一个多中心(50家社区药房)并行的三臂8周随机对照试验(RCT),并进行了52周的随访。在筛选的六天内,评估了1318人的TC,HDL和LDL-胆固醇,甘油三酸酯,HbA1c,BP和体重指数(BMI)。在这些样本中,将582个具有测量的和预定义的升高的临时CVD风险评分的患者随机分为警报/建议(n = 198)(立即提醒其筛查结果并接受健康的生活方式建议),仅咨询(n = 185)。 (仅接收建议)或控制(n = 199)(不警报,不建议)。 8周后在药房评估风险评分和自我报告的健康相关行为(饮食,饮酒,体育锻炼)的变化(N = 543,93%)。尽管主要分析显示两组之间无显着差异,但对照组的风险评分降低幅度最大,为14%。总体(无控制)样本(N = 543)使风险得分降低了3.2%,超出了估计值对均值的回归,并改善了他们与健康相关的行为。在基线后52周返回的65%(n = 377)的人中,有14%报告说在筛查后开始使用CVD预防药物。该研究表明,尽管评估药房中的危险因素和行为被证明是有效的,并且可能导致风险的小幅降低,但提醒人们注意其筛查结果似乎并不比自我指导的方法有效。标识符:。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号