首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Anatomy Cell Biology >Quantification of the use of eponyms in two Latin American congresses of anatomy
【2h】

Quantification of the use of eponyms in two Latin American congresses of anatomy

机译:在两次拉丁美洲解剖学大会上量化使用别名

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Eponyms have been part of medical language for many centuries, have put down powerful cultural roots, and continue to be used mainly in the language of medical specialties. The problem with eponymy is that it does not provide any relevant information about what is being studied, which hinders learning and generates communication problems. Ten oral presentations were randomly evaluated, as were all poster presentations made at the II Peruvian Congress on Morphological Sciences and the XV Ibero-Latin American Symposium on Anatomical, Histological, and Embryological Terminology, held in March of 2018 in Lima, Peru. This was done in order to quantify eponym use. Of the 10 oral presentations randomly selected, the eponym use was identified in six (60%). Of the 33 poster presentations made, six (18.18%) used eponyms. In conclusion, eponyms continue to be used indiscriminately in the language of the morphological sciences.
机译:几个世纪以来,别名一直是医学语言的组成部分,奠定了强大的文化根源,并继续主要用于医学专业语言。同名的问题是它没有提供有关正在研究的内容的任何相关信息,这阻碍了学习并产生了沟通问题。随机评估了十次口头报告,以及2018年3月在秘鲁利马举行的第二届秘鲁形态科学大会和第十五届伊比利亚-拉丁美洲解剖,组织学和胚胎学术语研讨会的所有张贴报告。这样做是为了量化同义词的使用。在随机选择的10个口头陈述中,有6个(60%)识别出同名异名。在进行的33次海报展示中,有六个(18.18%)使用了别名。总之,在形态科学的语言中继续不加选择地使用了别名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号