首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Computerized Analysis of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Patterns: Comparative Evaluation of Two Commercial Software Packages
【2h】

Computerized Analysis of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Patterns: Comparative Evaluation of Two Commercial Software Packages

机译:限制性片段长度多态性模式的计算机分析:两种商业软件包的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two computerized restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern analysis systems, the BioImage system and the GelCompar system (Molecular Analyst Fingerprinting Plus in the United States), were compared. The two systems use different approaches to compare patterns from different gels. In GelCompar, a standard reference pattern in one gel is used to normalize subsequent gels containing lanes with the same reference pattern. In BioImage, the molecular sizes of the fragments are calculated from size standards present in each gel. The molecular size estimates obtained with the two systems for 12 restriction fragments of phage λ were between 97 and 101% of their actual sizes, with a standard deviation of less than 1% of the average estimated size for most fragments. At the window sizes used for analysis, the GelCompar system performed somewhat better than BioImage in identifying visually identical patterns generated by electrophoretic separation of HhaI-restricted DNA of Listeria monocytogenes. Both systems require the user to make critical decisions in the analysis. It is very important to visually verify that the systems are finding all bands in each lane and that no artifacts are being detected; both systems allow manual editing. It is also important to verify results obtained in the pattern matching or clustering portions of the analysis.
机译:比较了两个计算机化的限制性片段长度多态性模式分析系统,即BioImage系统和GelCompar系统(在美国,Molecular Analyst Fingerprinting Plus)。两种系统使用不同的方法比较不同凝胶的图案。在GelCompar中,一种凝胶中的标准参考图样用于标准化包含相同参考图样的泳道的后续凝胶。在BioImage中,片段的分子大小是根据每种凝胶中存在的大小标准计算得出的。用这两种系统获得的12个噬菌体λ限制性片段的分子大小估计值在其实际大小的97%至101%之间,标准差小于大多数片段平均估计大小的1%。在用于分析的窗口大小下,GelCompar系统在鉴定通过电泳分离单核细胞增生李斯特菌HhaI限制DNA产生的视觉上相同的模式方面,比BioImage表现更好。这两个系统都要求用户在分析中做出关键决策。目视验证系统是否正在查找每个泳道中的所有频段以及没有检测到伪影,这一点非常重要。两种系统均允许手动编辑。验证在模式匹配或分析的聚类部分中获得的结果也很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号