首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluating scaled windowed variance methods for estimating the Hurst coefficient of time series
【2h】

Evaluating scaled windowed variance methods for estimating the Hurst coefficient of time series

机译:评估缩放的窗方差方法以估计时间序列的赫斯特系数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three-scaled windowed variance methods (standard, linear regression detrended, and brdge detrended) for estimating the Hurst coefficient (H) are evaluated. The Hurst coefficient, with 0 < H < 1, characterizes self-similar decay in the time-series autocorrelation function. The scaled windowed variance methods estimate H for fractional Brownian motion (fBm) signals which are cumulative sums of fractional Gaussian noise (fGn) signals. For all three methods both the bias and standard deviation of estimates are less than 0.05 for series having N ≥ 29 points. Estimates for short series (N < 28) are unreliable. To have a 0.95 probability of distinguishing between two signals with true H differing by 0.1, more than 215 points are needed. All three methods proved more reliable (based on bias and variance of estimates) than Hurst’s rescaled range analysis, periodogram analysis, and autocorrelation analysis, and as reliable as dispersional analysis. The latter methods can only be applied to fGn or differences of fBm, while the scaled windowed variance methods must be applied to fBm or cumulative sums of fGn.
机译:评估了用于估计赫斯特系数(H)的三尺度窗口方差方法(标准,线性回归趋势和桥梁趋势)。 0 9 点的序列,估计的偏差和标准偏差均小于0.05。短序列(N <2 8 )的估计不可靠。为了能够以0.95的概率区分真实H相差0.1的两个信号,需要超过2 15 点。事实证明,这三种方法(基于估计的偏差和方差)比赫斯特的重新缩放范围分析,周期图分析和自相关分析更可靠,并且与分散分析一样可靠。后一种方法只能应用于fGn或fBm的差,而缩放窗口方差方法必须应用于fBm或fGn的累加和。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号