首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Managed Care Backlash: Perceptions and Rhetoric in Health Care Policy and the Potential for Health Care Reform
【2h】

The Managed Care Backlash: Perceptions and Rhetoric in Health Care Policy and the Potential for Health Care Reform

机译:管理式医疗的强烈反对:医疗政策的认知和修辞以及医疗改革的潜力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The focus on managed care and the managed care backlash divert attention from more important national health issues, such as insurance coverage and quality of care. The ongoing public debate often does not accurately convey the key issues or the relevant evidence. Important perceptions of reduced encounter time with physicians, limitations on physicians' ability to communicate options to patients, and blocked access to inpatient care, among others, are either incorrect or exaggerated. The public backlash reflects a lack of trust resulting from cost constraints, explicit rationing, and media coverage. Inevitable errors are now readily attributed to managed care practices and organizations. Some procedural consumer protections may help restore the eroding trust and refocus public discussion on more central issues.
机译:对管理式医疗和管理式医疗的强烈关注转移了人们对更重要的国家健康问题的关注,例如保险范围和医疗质量。正在进行的公开辩论通常无法准确传达关键问题或相关证据。减少与医生会面时间,限制医生与患者沟通选择权的能力以及阻碍获得住院护理等重要观念都是不正确或夸大的。公众的强烈反对反映了由于成本限制,明确的配给和媒体报道而导致的信任不足。现在,不可避免的错误很容易归因于管理式护理实践和组织。某些程序性的消费者保护措施可能有助于恢复逐渐丧失的信任,并使公众讨论的重点重新转向更核心的问题。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    David Mechanic;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(79),1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 35–54
  • 总页数 20
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号