首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Drug Court Effectiveness: A Review of California Evaluation Reports 1995–1999
【2h】

Drug Court Effectiveness: A Review of California Evaluation Reports 1995–1999

机译:毒品法庭效力:1995-1999年加利福尼亚评估报告的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past two decades, drug courts have emerged as a viable alternative for addressing drug cases within the criminal justice system. In California, the Drug Court Partnership Program (DCPP) was created in 1998 and has supported and funded the development of drug courts throughout the State. This article reports on a review of California drug court evaluations through January 2000 conducted as part of an evaluation of the California DCPP. A total of 23 evaluations were collected. Seventeen were reviewed in detail, and six were excluded because they were internal reports rather than evaluations. A standardized review process was initiated which led to a scored rating of the evaluation reports. Results of this review support previous findings that drug court participants may experience reduced rearrest rates by 11% to 14% compared to nonparticipants. The largest reduction in rearrest rates appears among graduates. The graduation rates were between 19% and 54%. Costs and savings associated with drug courts were discussed but no conclusions were possible based on the findings from these evaluations. The evaluation of the effectiveness of drug courts presents unique challenges. This review concludes with a discussion of evaluation methods (e.g. standardizing rate calculations, term definitions) that would strengthen drug court research.
机译:在过去的二十年中,毒品法庭已成为解决刑事司法系统内毒品案件的可行选择。在加利福尼亚州,毒品法庭合作伙伴计划(DCPP)于1998年创建,为全州毒品法庭的发展提供了支持和资助。本文报告了到2000年1月为止对加州毒品法院的评估,这是对加州DCPP评估的一部分。总共收集了23个评估。详细审查了17个,排除了6个,因为它们是内部报告而不是评估。启动了标准化的审查流程,从而对评估报告进行了评分。这项审查的结果支持以前的发现,即与非参与者相比,毒品法庭参与者的后坐率可能降低11%至14%。毕业生中,后坐率下降幅度最大。毕业率在19%至54%之间。讨论了与毒品法庭有关的成本和节省,但根据这些评估的结果无法得出任何结论。对毒品法庭效力的评估提出了独特的挑战。这篇综述以对评估方法(例如标准化利率计算,术语定义)的讨论作为结尾,该方法将加强毒品法庭的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号