首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency
【2h】

A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency

机译:同音异义词和新单词学习的比较:音素概率和单词频率的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compares homonym learning to novel word learning by three- to four-year-old children to determine whether homonyms are learned more rapidly or more slowly than novel words. In addition, the role of form characteristics in homonym learning is examined by manipulating phonotactic probability and word frequency. Thirty-two children were exposed to homonyms and novel words in a story with visual support and learning was measured in two tasks: referent identification; picture naming. Results showed that responses to homonyms were as accurate as responses to novel words in the referent identification task. In contrast, responses to homonyms were more accurate than responses to novel words in the picture-naming task. Furthermore, homonyms composed of common sound sequences were named more accurately than those composed of rare sound sequences. The influence of word frequency was less straightforward. These results may be inconsistent with a one-to-one form-referent bias in word learning.
机译:这项研究将三至四岁儿童的同音异义词学习与新奇单词学习进行了比较,以确定同形异义词比新词学习得更快或更慢。另外,通过操纵音变的概率和单词频率来检查形式特征在同音异义词学习中的作用。在一个有视觉支持的故事中,有32个孩子接触了同音异义词和新颖的单词,并且在两项任务中对学习进行了衡量:参照对象识别;图片命名。结果表明,在参照物识别任务中,对同音异义词的响应与对新单词的响应一样准确。相反,在图片命名任务中,对同音异义词的响应比对新颖单词的响应更准确。此外,由普通声音序列组成的同音异义词比由稀有声音序列组成的同音异义词更准确。词频的影响不太直接。这些结果可能与单词学习中的一对一形式参考偏差不一致。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(32),4
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 827–853
  • 总页数 23
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号