首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Primary identification of Aureobacterium spp. isolated from clinical specimens as Corynebacterium aquaticum.
【2h】

Primary identification of Aureobacterium spp. isolated from clinical specimens as Corynebacterium aquaticum.

机译:金黄色葡萄球菌的初步鉴定。从临床标本中分离出来的水杆菌。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over a 6-year period 11 yellow-pigmented gram-positive rods (GPRs) with an oxidative carbohydrate metabolism were isolated from clinical specimens or were received as reference cultures and tentatively identified as "Corynebacterium aquaticum" according to the guide of Hollis and Weaver for the differentiation of GPRs (D. G. Hollis and R. E. Weaver, Gram-Positive Organisms: a Guide to Identification, 1981). Because these isolates seemed to be rather heterogeneous, comparative analyses with the type strain of "C. aquaticum" as well as six type strains of species belonging to the genus Aureobacterium were performed by biochemical and chemotaxonomic methods. Only four clinical strains were found to be "C. aquaticum," whereas seven strains were found to belong to the genus Aureobacterium. Discriminative phenotypic reactions between "C. aquaticum" and Aureobacterium spp. included hydrolysis of gelatin and casein (both reactions negative for "C. aquaticum" strains but positive for most Aureobacterium strains). Moreover, peptidoglycan analysis provided a reliable means of differentiating yellow-pigmented GPRs at the genus level (diaminobutyric acid as the interpeptide bridge in "C. aquaticum" and glycine-ornithine as the interpeptide bridge in Aureobacterium spp.). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that vancomycin showed an intermediate MIC for three of the four clinical "C. aquaticum" isolates, whereas all Aureobacterium strains were susceptible to vancomycin. To our knowledge, this is the first report outlining the isolation of Aureobacterium spp. from clinical specimens. However, Aureobacterium isolates could not be identified to the species level by the tests used in the study.
机译:在6年的时间里,从临床标本中分离出11种带有氧化性碳水化合物代谢的黄色色素革兰氏阳性棒(GPR)或作为参考培养物,并根据Hollis和Weaver的指南初步鉴定为“水杆菌”。 GPR的分化(DG Hollis和RE Weaver,《革兰氏阳性生物:鉴定指南》,1981年)。因为这些分离物似乎是异质的,所以通过生化和化学分类学方法对“水生梭状芽胞杆菌”类型菌株以及属于金黄色杆菌属的六种类型菌株进行了比较分析。仅发现了四个临床菌株为“水生梭状芽胞杆菌”,而发现七个菌株属于金黄色葡萄球菌属。 “水生梭状芽胞杆菌”和金黄色葡萄球菌之间的区别表型反应。包括明胶和酪蛋白的水解(“ C. aquaticum”菌株均为阴性,而大多数金黄色葡萄球菌均为阳性)。此外,肽聚糖分析提供了区分属黄色水平的GPR的可靠方法(二氨基丁酸作为“水生梭状芽胞杆菌”中的肽桥,甘氨酸-鸟氨酸作为金黄色葡萄球菌中的肽桥)。抗菌药敏试验表明,万古霉素对四种临床“水生梭状芽胞杆菌”分离株中的三株显示中等MIC,而所有金黄色葡萄球菌菌株均对万古霉素敏感。据我们所知,这是第一份概述金黄色葡萄球菌分离的报告。从临床标本。但是,通过研究中使用的测试无法将金黄色葡萄球菌分离物鉴定到物种水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号