首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur Chlamydia Microplate EIA shortened assay and comparison with cell culture and Syva Chlamydia MicroTrak II EIA in high- and low-risk populations.
【2h】

Evaluation of Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur Chlamydia Microplate EIA shortened assay and comparison with cell culture and Syva Chlamydia MicroTrak II EIA in high- and low-risk populations.

机译:赛诺菲诊断巴斯德衣原体微孔板EIA的评估缩短了在高风险和低风险人群中与细胞培养和Syva衣原体MicroTrak II EIA的比较并进行了比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Seven hundred thirty-two female urogenital samples were collected for Chlamydia trachomatis testing by both the Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur (Chaska, Minn.) Chlamydia Microplate EIA by the shortened protocol and the Syva (San Jose, Calif.) MicroTrak II EIA, and the results were compared with those obtained by cell culture. For the analysis of samples from female patients, the patients were divided into high- and low-risk categories. An additional 121 male urethral samples were collected and tested by the Sanofi Microplate EIA and cell culture; for the analysis of samples from male patients, the patients were divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic categories. All specimens positive by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were confirmed by a blocking assay following the respective manufacturer's instructions. Specimens negative by EIA that fell within a gray zone 30% below the cutoff and negative cultures with one or more corresponding positive EIA results were tested further by cytocentrifugation and direct immunofluorescent assay. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for Syva versus culture were 94, 98.8, 85.5 and 99.6%, respectively. After resolution, the results were 94.5, 99.6, 94.5, and 99.6%, respectively. The parallel results for the Sanofi Microplate EIA versus culture were 94.0, 98.7, and 83.9, and 99.6%, respectively, and after being resolved, the results were 94.9, 100, 100, and 99.6%, respectively. In the small male population tested, the resolved results of the Sanofi Microplate EIA versus culture demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100, 100, 100, and 100%, respectively. The present study demonstrated that the Sanofi Microplate EIA shortened protocol is highly sensitive and specific in comparison with cell culture and the Syva MicroTrak II EIA.
机译:赛诺菲诊断巴斯德公司(明尼苏达州查斯卡)的衣原体微孔板EIA(按缩短方案)和Syva(加利福尼亚州圣何塞)MicroTrak II EIA收集了732例女性沙眼衣原体检测沙眼衣原体。与通过细胞培养获得的结果进行比较。为了分析女性患者的样本,将患者分为高风险和低风险类别。收集了另外121个男性尿道样本,并通过Sanofi Microplate EIA和细胞培养进行了测试;为了分析男性患者的样本,将患者分为无症状和有症状两类。酶免疫测定法(EIA)呈阳性的所有标本均按照各自制造商的说明通过封闭测定法进行了确认。通过EIA阴性的标本落在截止值以下30%的灰色区域内,带有一个或多个相应EIA阳性结果的阴性培养物通过细胞离心和直接免疫荧光分析进一步测试。与培养相比,Syva的总体敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94、98.8、85.5和99.6%。解析后,结果分别为94.5、99.6、94.5和99.6%。赛诺菲微孔板EIA与培养物的平行结果分别为94.0、98.7和83.9和99.6%,解决后,结果分别为94.9、100、100和99.6%。在测试的少量男性人群中,赛诺菲微孔板EIA与培养物的分辨结果显示灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%,100%,100%和100%。本研究表明,与细胞培养和Syva MicroTrak II EIA相比,赛诺菲微孔板EIA缩短的方案具有很高的敏感性和特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号