首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Roles of dorsal column pathway and TRPV1 in augmentation of cerebral blood flow by upper cervical spinal cord stimulation in rats
【2h】

Roles of dorsal column pathway and TRPV1 in augmentation of cerebral blood flow by upper cervical spinal cord stimulation in rats

机译:背柱通路和TRPV1在上颈脊髓刺激大鼠脑血流增加中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical and basic studies have indicated that upper cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) significant increases cerebral blood flow (CBF), but the mechanisms are incompletely understood. This investigation was conducted to differentiate between stimulation of dorsal column fibers and upper cervical spinal cord cell bodies in cSCS-induced increases in CBF and decreases in cerebral vascular resistance (CVR). cSCS (50 Hz, 0.2 ms, 1 min) was applied on the left C1-C2 dorsal column n pentobarbital anesthetized, ventilated and paralyzed male rats. Laser Doppler flowmetry probes were placed bilaterally over the parietal cortex, and arterial pressure was monitored. cSCS at 30%, 60%, and 90% of motor threshold (MT) produced vasodilation bilaterally in cerebral cortices. Subsequently, cSCS was applied at 90% MT, and ipsilateral responses were recorded. Ibotenic acid (0.3mg/ml, 0.1ml) placed on dorsal surface of C1-C2 (n=7) to suppress cell body activity, did not affect cSCS-induced %□CBF (42.5±8.1% vs 36.8±7.1%, P>0.05□and %□CVR (−19.4±4.2% vs −15.2±5.6%, P>0.05). However, bilateral transection of the dorsal column at rostral C1 (n=8) abolished cSCS-induced changes in CBF and CVR. Also, rostral C1 transection (n=7) abolished cSCS-induced changes in CBF and CVR. Resinferatoxin (RTX), an ultra potent TRPV1 agonist, was used to inactivate TRPV1 containing nerve fibers / cell bodies. RTX (2 µg/ml□0.1ml) placed on the C1-C2 spinal cord (n=7) did not affect cSCS-induced %ΔCBF (60.2±8.1% vs 46.3±7.7%, P>0.05) and %ΔCVR (−25.5±3.5% vs −21.4±8.9%, P>0.05). However, intravenous RTX (2 µg/kg, n=9) decreased cSCS-induced %ΔCBF from 65.0±9.5% to 27.4±7.2% (P<0.05) and %ΔCVR from −28.0±7.6% to −14.8±4.2% (P<0.05). These results indicated that cSCS-increases in CBF and decreases in CVR occurred via rostral spinal dorsal column fibers and did not depend upon C1-C2 cell bodies. Also, our results suggested that cerebral but not spinal TRPV1 was involved in cSCS-induced cerebral vasodilation.
机译:临床和基础研究表明,上颈椎脊髓刺激(cSCS)显着增加了脑血流量(CBF),但其机理尚不完全清楚。进行这项研究是为了区分刺激cSCS诱导的CBF升高和脑血管阻力(CVR)降低的背柱纤维和上颈脊髓细胞体的刺激。将cSCS(50 Hz,0.2 ms,1分钟)应用于戊巴比妥麻醉,通风和麻痹的雄性大鼠的左C1-C2背柱上。激光多普勒血流仪探头两侧放置在顶叶皮层上方,并监测动脉压。 cSCS分别达到运动阈值(MT)的30%,60%和90%时,在大脑皮层的两侧产生了血管舒张。随后,以90%MT施用cSCS,并记录同侧反应。放置在C1-C2背侧(n = 7)的艾波烯酸(0.3mg / ml,0.1ml)抑制细胞体活性,未影响cSCS诱导的%□CBF(42.5±8.1%vs 36.8±7.1%, P> 0.05□和%□CVR(-19.4±4.2%vs -15.2±5.6%,P> 0.05)。然而,在头侧C1(n = 8)背侧双侧横断切断了cSCS诱导的CBF和CBF的变化。 CVR。另外,鼻侧C1横切术(n = 7)消除了cSCS诱导的CBF和CVR改变;使用强力TRPV1激动剂Resinferatoxin(RTX)灭活含有神经纤维/细胞体的TRPV1。RTX(2 µg /置于C1-C2脊髓(n = 7)上的ml□0.1ml)不影响cSCS诱导的%ΔCBF(60.2±8.1%vs 46.3±7.7%,P> 0.05)和%ΔCVR(−25.5±3.5%)与−21.4±8.9%,P> 0.05)相比,静脉注射RTX(2 µg / kg,n = 9)将cSCS诱导的%ΔCBF从65.0±9.5%降至27.4±7.2%(P <0.05)和%ΔCVR从−28.0±7.6%到−14.8±4.2%(P <0.05)。这些结果表明cSCS的增加和CVR的减少是通过延髓脊髓背柱纤维发生的依赖于C1-C2细胞体。同样,我们的结果表明,大脑而非脊髓TRPV1参与cSCS诱导的脑血管舒张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号