首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of three rapid methods for detection of antibodies to streptolysin O and DNase B.
【2h】

Comparison of three rapid methods for detection of antibodies to streptolysin O and DNase B.

机译:三种快速检测链球菌溶血素O和DNase B抗体的方法的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three commercial systems were compared for ability to detect antibodies to streptolysin O (ASO) and DNase B (ADB). Streptozyme (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) exhibited high sensitivity (100%) for detecting ASO but low sensitivity for ADB (22.2%). The LeapStrep (Organon Teknika, Malvern, Pa.) and Check-Spectra (Diagnostic Technology, Hauppauge, N.Y.) tests had low sensitivities for detecting ASO (35.3 and 21.4%, respectively) and ADB (22.2 and 33.3%, respectively).
机译:比较了三种商业系统检测链球菌溶血素O(ASO)和DNase B(ADB)抗体的能力。链霉菌酶(Wampole Laboratories,Cranbury,NJ)显示出检测ASO的高灵敏度(100%),但是对ADB的灵敏度低(22.2%)。 LeapStrep(宾夕法尼亚州马尔文的Organon Teknika)和Check-Spectra(纽约州Hauppauge的诊断技术)测试对ASO(分别为35.3和21.4%)和ADB(分别为22.2和33.3%)的检测灵敏度较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号