首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Epoch length to accurately estimate the amplitude of interference EMG is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation
【2h】

Epoch length to accurately estimate the amplitude of interference EMG is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation

机译:准确估计干扰EMG幅度的历元长度可能是不可避免的幅度抵消的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Researchers and clinicians routinely rely on interference electromyograms (EMGs) to estimate muscle forces and command signals in the neuromuscular system (e.g., amplitude, timing, and frequency content). The amplitude cancellation intrinsic to interference EMG, however, raises important questions about how to optimize these estimates. For example, what should the length of the epoch (time window) be to average an EMG signal to reliably estimate muscle forces and command signals? Shorter epochs are most practical, and significant reductions in epoch have been reported with high-pass filtering and whitening. Given that this processing attenuates power at frequencies of interest (< 250 Hz), however, it is unclear how it improves the extraction of physiologically-relevant information. We examined the influence of amplitude cancellation and high-pass filtering on the epoch necessary to accurately estimate the “true” average EMG amplitude calculated from a 28 s EMG trace (EMGref) during simulated constant isometric conditions. Monte Carlo iterations of a motor-unit model simulating 28 s of surface EMG produced 245 simulations under 2 conditions: with and without amplitude cancellation. For each simulation, we calculated the epoch necessary to generate average full-wave rectified EMG amplitudes that settled within 5% of EMGref. For the no-cancellation EMG, the necessary epochs were short (e.g., < 100 ms). For the more realistic interference EMG (i.e., cancellation condition), epochs shortened dramatically after using high-pass filter cutoffs above 250 Hz, producing epochs short enough to be practical (i.e., < 500 ms). We conclude that the need to use long epochs to accurately estimate EMG amplitude is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation, which helps to clarify why high-pass filtering (> 250 Hz) improves EMG estimates.
机译:研究人员和临床医生通常会依靠干扰肌电图(EMG)来估计神经肌肉系统中的肌肉力量和命令信号(例如,振幅,时间和频率含量)。然而,干扰肌电图固有的幅度抵消提出了有关如何优化这些估计的重要问题。例如,为了使EMG信号平均以可靠地估计肌肉力量和命令信号,历元的长度(时间窗口)应该是多少?较短的时期是最实用的,并且据报道,通过高通滤波和白化可以大大减少时期。但是,由于该处理会衰减感兴趣频率(<250 Hz)的功率,因此尚不清楚它如何改善生理相关信息的提取。我们检查了幅度抵消和高通滤波对精确估计由等距恒定条件下的28 s EMG轨迹(EMGref)计算出的“真实”平均EMG幅度所必需的时间段的影响。在两个条件下(带有和不带有幅度抵消),模拟28秒钟表面EMG的电机模型的Monte Carlo迭代产生了245次仿真。对于每个模拟,我们计算了生成平均全波整流EMG振幅(稳定在EMGref的5%以内)所需的时间。对于不可取消的EMG,必要的时间很短(例如,<100 ms)。对于更实际的干扰EMG(即消除条件),使用高于250 Hz的高通滤波器截止后,历元大大缩短,产生了足够短的历时(即<500 ms)。我们得出结论,需要使用较长的时间段来准确估算EMG幅度很可能是不可避免的幅度抵消的结果,这有助于阐明为什么高通滤波(> 250 Hz)会改善EMG估算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号