首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of Anxiety Sensitivity among Daily Adult Smokers using Item Response Theory Analysis
【2h】

Evaluation of Anxiety Sensitivity among Daily Adult Smokers using Item Response Theory Analysis

机译:项目反应理论分析评价成人吸烟者的焦虑敏感性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present investigation applied Item Response Theory (IRT) methodology to the 16-item Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI; ) for a sample of 475 daily adult smokers (52% women; Mage = 26.9, SD = 11.1, Range = 18 – 65). Using nonparametric item response analysis, all 16 ASI items were evaluated. Evaluation of the Option Characteristic Curves for each item revealed 4 poorly discriminating ASI items (1: “It is important not to appear nervous;” 5: “It is important to me to stay in control of my emotions;” 7: “It embarrasses me when my stomach growls;” 9: “When I notice my heart beating rapidly, I worry that I might be having a heart attack”), which were dropped from analysis. Upon repeat analysis, the remaining items appeared to make adequate separations within levels of anxiety sensitivity in this sample. Graded response modeling data indicated important differences in ASI items’ capacity to discriminate between, and provide information about, latent levels of anxiety sensitivity. Specifically, three items best discriminated and provided the most information regarding latent levels of AS - items 3, 15, and 16. Items 1, 5, 7, and 9 were omitted due to their limited capacity to discriminate between latent levels of anxiety sensitivity; items 8, 12, and 13 also performed poorly. Overall, current findings suggest that evaluation of anxiety sensitivity among adult smokers using the 16-item ASI may usefully choose to focus on items that performed well in these IRT analyses (items: 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 16).
机译:本研究将项目反应理论(IRT)方法应用于16个项目的焦虑敏感性指数(ASI;),以对475名每日成年吸烟者(52%的女性;法师= 26.9,SD = 11.1,范围= 18 – 65)进行抽样。使用非参数项目响应分析,对所有16个ASI项目进行了评估。对每个项目的期权特征曲线进行评估后发现,有4个ASI项目难以区分(1:“重要的是不要显得紧张;” 5:“对我来说,保持情绪控制很重要;” 7:“这很尴尬当我的胃不舒服时我;” 9:“当我注意到我的心脏跳动很快时,我担心自己可能会心脏病发作”),这是从分析中删除的。经过重复分析,在该样品中,其余项目似乎在焦虑敏感性水平内进行了足够的分离。分级的响应模型数据表明,ASI项目区分潜在的焦虑敏感性水平并提供有关信息的能力方面存在重要差异。具体来说,最好区分三个项目,并提供有关AS潜在水平的最多信息-项目3、15和16。由于区分焦虑敏感性潜在水平的能力有限,因此省略了项目1、5、7和9。项目8、12和13也表现不佳。总体而言,当前的发现表明,使用16项ASI对成年吸烟者的焦虑敏感性进行评估可能会有益地选择关注那些在这些IRT分析中表现良好的项目(项目:2、3、4、6、10、11、14, 15和16)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号