首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Cost Analysis of Clinic and Office-based Treatment of Opioid Dependence: Results with Methadone and Buprenorphine in Clinically Stable Patients
【2h】

Cost Analysis of Clinic and Office-based Treatment of Opioid Dependence: Results with Methadone and Buprenorphine in Clinically Stable Patients

机译:美沙酮和丁丙诺啡在临床稳定患者中的临床和基于办公室的阿片类药物依赖治疗费用分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The cost of providing and receiving treatment for opioid dependence can determine its adoption. To compare the cost of clinic-based methadone (MC, n=23), office-based methadone (MO, n=21), and office-based buprenorphine (BO, n=34) we performed an analysis of treatment and patient costs over 6 months of maintenance in patients who had previously been stabilized for at least one year. We performed statistical comparisons using ANOVA and chi-square tests and performed a sensitivity analysis varying cost estimates and intensity of clinical contact. The cost of providing one month of treatment per patient was $147 (MC), $220 (MO) and $336 (BO) (p<0.001). Mean monthly medication cost was $93 (MC), $86 (MO) and $257 (BO) (p<0.001). The cost to patients was $92 (MC), $63 (MO) and $38 (BO) (p=0.102). Sensitivity analyses, varying cost estimates and clinical contact, result in total monthly costs of $117 to $183 (MC), $149 to $279 (MO), $292 to $499(BO). Monthly patient costs were $84 to $133 (MC), $55 to $105 (MO) and $34 to $65 (BO). We conclude that providing clinic-based methadone is least expensive. The price of buprenorphine accounts for a major portion of the difference in costs. For patients, office-based treatment may be less expensive.
机译:提供和接受阿片类药物依赖治疗的费用可以决定其采用程度。为了比较基于临床的美沙酮(MC,n = 23),基于办公室的美沙酮(MO,n = 21)和基于办公室的丁丙诺啡(BO,n = 34)的费用,我们对治疗和患者费用进行了分析对以前稳定了至少一年的患者进行了6个月以上的维护。我们使用方差分析和卡方检验进行了统计比较,并进行了敏感性分析,从而改变了成本估算和临床接触强度。每位患者提供一个月治疗的费用为$ 147(MC),$ 220(MO)和$ 336(BO)(p <0.001)。平均每月药物费用为$ 93(MC),$ 86(MO)和$ 257(BO)(p <0.001)。患者的费用为$ 92(MC),$ 63(MO)和$ 38(BO)(p = 0.102)。敏感性分析,不同的费用估算和临床接触后,每月总费用为$ 117至$ 183(MC),$ 149至$ 279(MO),$ 292至$ 499(BO)。每月患者费用为$ 84至$ 133(MC),$ 55至$ 105(MO)和$ 34至$ 65(BO)。我们得出的结论是,提供基于临床的美沙酮最便宜。丁丙诺啡的价格占成本差异的很大部分。对于患者而言,基于办公室的治疗可能更便宜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号