首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Micro-Media Systems anaerobe panel versus broth disk method in anaerobe antimicrobial testing.
【2h】

Micro-Media Systems anaerobe panel versus broth disk method in anaerobe antimicrobial testing.

机译:Micro-Media Systems厌氧菌平板与肉汤盘法进行厌氧菌抗菌测试。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Frozen microtitration trays manufactured by Micro-Media Systems (MMS) for antimicrobial testing of anaerobic bacteria were evaluated and compared with the broth disk elution method of Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VPI) described by Wilkins and Thiel. A total of 224 clinical anaerobic isolates were tested. Susceptibility results were compared for carbenicillin, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, penicillin, and tetracycline. Published procedures for the MMS and VPI methods were followed using aerobic inoculation. Growth performance in the MMS method was 74% compared with 89% in the VPI method. For each antibiotic, the MMS minimum inhibitory concentration was compared with the VPI test concentration. Of the 972 drug-organism combinations, 2.9% of the results were discrepant. Clindamycin and tetracycline accounted for 82% of the discrepancies. The MMS anaerobe susceptibility panels were easy to inoculate and interpret and compared well with the VPI broth disk susceptibility method.
机译:评价了由Micro-Media Systems(MMS)制造的用于厌氧菌抗菌测试的冷冻微量滴定盘,并将其与Wilkins和Thiel描述的Virginia Polytechnic Institute(VPI)的肉汤圆盘洗脱方法进行了比较。总共测试了224种临床厌氧菌。比较了羧苄西林,头孢西丁,氯霉素,克林霉素,青霉素和四环素的药敏结果。使用有氧接种遵循已发布的MMS和VPI方法。 MMS方法的生长性能为74%,而VPI方法的生长性能为89%。对于每种抗生素,将MMS的最小抑菌浓度与VPI测试浓度进行比较。在972种药物生物组合中,有2.9%的结果不一致。克林霉素和四环素占差异的82%。 MMS厌氧菌药敏面板易于接种和解释,并与VPI肉汤圆盘药敏法比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号