首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects >Evaluation of Apical Micro-leakage of Different Endodontic Sealers in thePresence and Absence of Moisture
【2h】

Evaluation of Apical Micro-leakage of Different Endodontic Sealers in thePresence and Absence of Moisture

机译:牙髓不同根管封闭剂根尖微渗漏的评价。有无水分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and aims. With availability of hydrophilic sealers, drying of the canals before endodontic obturation is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the apical micro-leakage of AH26, Excite DSC, MTA Fillapex, and ZOE sealers in dry and moist root canals.>Materials and methods. This experimental study was performed on 90 extracted maxillary central incisors. Rotary files were used for preparation of the canals. Root canals were filled with a single gutta percha cone, using one of the four sealers, under dry and moist root canal conditions (10 teeth in each group). Orifices were sealed with glue wax and all root surfaces were covered with nail polish except the positive control group. After ten days in 100% humidity, teeth were placed in methylene blue, and then were cut in longitudinal axis. Blue color permeability was measured by stereomicroscope in micrometers. Data were analyzed by t-test, ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc test using SPSS V.18 software at P < 0.05.>Results. Mean apical micro-leakage was significantly lower in the dry groups (P < 0.001). Minimum and maximum micro-leakage was seen in AH26 and ZOE, respectively. MTA Fillapex did not exhibit a significant difference in apical micro-leakage between dry and moist conditions (P > 0.05). Apical micro-leakage was significantly higher in the Excite DSC groups (P < 0.001).>Conclusion. AH26 provided the least apical micro-leakage under dryconditions while ZOE had the highest micro-leakage under moist conditions. MTA Fillapexprovided acceptable apical seal regardless of moisture.
机译:>背景和目标。随着亲水性封闭剂的问世,在根管充填之前对运河进行干燥仍是一个有争议的问题。本研究的目的是比较AH26,Excite DSC,MTA Fillapex和ZOE封闭剂在干,湿根管中的根尖微渗漏。>材料和方法。该实验研究在90进行。拔出上颌中切牙。旋转锉用于准备运河。在干燥和潮湿的根管条件下(每组10颗牙齿),使用四个封闭器中的一个,将根管充满单个牙胶。用胶蜡密封孔,除阳性对照组外,所有根部表面均用指甲油覆盖。在100%湿度下十天后,将牙齿放在亚甲蓝中,然后沿纵轴切割。通过立体显微镜以微米为单位测量蓝色渗透率。使用SPSS V.18软件通过t检验,ANOVA和Scheffe事后检验对数据进行分析,结果P <0.05。>结果。在干燥组中,平均根尖微渗漏显着降低(P <0.001 )。 AH26和ZOE分别看到最小和最大微泄漏。在干燥和潮湿条件下,MTA Fillapex的根尖微渗漏没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。 Excite DSC组的根尖微渗漏明显更高(P <0.001)。>结论。在干燥状态下,AH26的根尖微渗漏最少在潮湿条件下,ZOE的微漏率最高。 MTA Fillapex提供了可接受的根尖密封件,而不受潮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号