首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine
【2h】

A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine

机译:现实环境研究:哪种血糖仪最适合POCT使用?医院例行程序中的一项简单而适用的协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the reliability and robustness of six glucose meters for point-of-care testing in our wards using a brand-new protocol. During a 30-days study period a total of 50 diabetes patients were subjected to venous blood sampling and glucose meter blood analysis. The results of six glucose meters were compared with our laboratory reference assay. GlucoMen Plus (Menarini) with the 82% of acceptable results was the most robust glucose meter. Even if the Passing-Bablok analysis demonstrates the presence of constant systematic errors and the Bland-Altman test highlighted a possible overestimation, the surveillance error grid analysis showed that this glucose meter can be used safely. We proved that portable glucose meters are not always reliable in routinely clinical settings.
机译:这项回顾性研究的目的是使用崭新的协议评估六种血糖仪在我们病房中进行即时检验的可靠性和耐用性。在为期30天的研究期内,总共对50名糖尿病患者进行了静脉血采样和血糖仪血液分析。将六个血糖仪的结果与我们的实验室参考测定法进行了比较。 GlucoMen Plus(Menarini)的82%可接受结果是最坚固的血糖仪。即使Passing-Bablok分析表明存在恒定的系统误差,而Bland-Altman测试强调了可能的高估,监视误差网格分析表明该血糖仪可以安全使用。我们证明了便携式血糖仪在常规临床环境中并不总是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号