首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >United States Patient Preference and Usability for the New Disposable Insulin Device Solostar® versus Other Disposable Pens
【2h】

United States Patient Preference and Usability for the New Disposable Insulin Device Solostar® versus Other Disposable Pens

机译:新型一次性胰岛素设备Solostar®与其他一次性笔在美国的患者偏好和可用性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The uptake of insulin pen use has been slow in the United States, despite their advantages over the vial/ syringe. We present results of a United States subset of 150 patients with type 1/type 2 diabetes, who were enrolled in an open-label study, that assessed usability, pen features, and patient preferences for four prefilled insulin pens: SoloSTAR®, FlexPen®, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype, Pen X. Overall, the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were more user-friendly; 95 and 88% of patients, respectively, completed the steps correctly (without safety/attach-needle step—deemed independent of device) versus the Lilly disposable pen (60%) and Pen X (61%; all p < 0.05). The SoloSTAR was rated highest most frequently for pen feature comparisons. Results suggest that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen could potentially facilitate insulin use in the United States.
机译:尽管它们比小瓶/注射器有优势,但在美国,胰岛素笔的使用缓慢。我们介绍了一项美国150名1型/ 2型糖尿病患者的子集,这些患者参加了一项开放标签研究,评估了四支预装胰岛素笔的可用性,笔功能和患者偏好:SoloSTAR ® ,FlexPen ®,礼来的一次性笔和原型PenX。总的来说,SoloSTAR和FlexPen更加用户友好。与礼来一次性笔(60%)和笔X(61%;所有p <0.05)相比,分别有95和88%的患者正确完成了这些步骤(无安全/针刺步骤-认为与设备无关)。在笔功能比较中,SoloSTAR被评为最高频率。结果表明,SoloSTAR和FlexPen可能在美国促进胰岛素的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号